https://doi.org/10.55788/c4501c3c
The phase 3 ZEPHYRUS-1 trial (NCT03955146) enrolled patients with IPF who were not being treated with antifibrotic therapy (n=356). Participants were randomised 1:1 to pamrevlumab or a placebo, to assess whether this connective tissue growth factor inhibitor can slow down the deterioration of lung function in this patient population [1].
At week 48, the FVC change from baseline was -260 mL in the pamrevlumab arm and -330 mL in the control arm, a non-significant difference (95% CI -60 to +90; P=0.29). Similarly, secondary and exploratory endpoints revealed no substantial differences between the pamrevlumab arm and the placebo arm.
âAlthough this was a well-designed trial, with a large, diverse population, and using modern technologies such as machine learning to quantify imaging of fibrosis, the results are disappointing,â commented Dr Ganesh Raghu (UW Medical Center, WA, USA). âIn previous phase 2 studies, pamrevlumab had displayed promising signs of clinical activity.â Dr Raghu reasoned that the smaller cohorts of the phase 2 studies, the fact that patients in the ZEPHYRUS-1 study had more lung function impairment, and the permission of concomitant pirfenidone or nintedanib during the phase 3 trial, as opposed to the phase 2 trials, may have contributed to the contrasting results.
âPhase 2 trials should be representative of the general population from which phase 3 trials should be drawn, and test similar outcomes,â argued Dr Raghu. âNext to that, we should consider using composite endpoints in future IPF trials, including âfeelsâ, functions, and survive measures, mirroring the lived experience of patients with IPF.â
- Raghu G, et al. Pamrevlumab for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: results of the phase 3 ZEPHYRUS-1 study. C95: New clinical trial results in chronic lung disease. ATS 2024, 17â22 May, San Diego, USA.
Medical writing support was provided by Robert van den Heuvel.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Can we safely use betablockers in COPD? Next Article
STARSCAPE: Zinpentraxin alfa does not ameliorate health status in IPF »
« Can we safely use betablockers in COPD? Next Article
STARSCAPE: Zinpentraxin alfa does not ameliorate health status in IPF »
Table of Contents: ATS 2024
Featured articles
NOTUS: Dupilumab safe and efficacious in COPD with type 2 inflammation
Sulthiame may be the next treatment for OSA
Miscellaneous Topics
Pirfenidone may alleviate disease burden in DRCB
Can mindfulness reduce depression and anxiety in ICU survivors?
Exercise and diet improve functional status in PAH
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
STARSCAPE: Zinpentraxin alfa does not ameliorate health status in IPF
COPD
COURSE: Encouraging results for tezepelumab in COPD
Ensifentrine delays transition from GOLD B to GOLD E in COPD
NOTUS: Dupilumab safe and efficacious in COPD with type 2 inflammation
BOREAS: Blood eosinophil count and FeNO levels predictive of dupilumab response in COPD
Respiratory Infections
Two regimens deliver high sputum conversion rates in M. xenopi pulmonary infection
Patient-reported outcomes improve practice in MAC lung disease
Novel RSV vaccine to prevent serious respiratory illness
Asthma
UCAP: Identify and treat undiagnosed COPD or asthma
Structural and functional lung improvement with dupilumab in asthma
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Is the Apnea Hypopnea Index ready to be replaced?
Does PAP therapy truly reduce mortality in OSA?
Sulthiame may be the next treatment for OSA
Related Articles
July 18, 2022
POISE-3: Tranexamic acid for non-cardiac surgery
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com