Home > Oncology > ESMO GI 2024 > Gastric and Oesophageal Cancer > OS benefit in ARMANI, but is it worth it?

OS benefit in ARMANI, but is it worth it?

Presented by
Dr Giovanni Randon, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Italy
Conference
ESMO GI 2024
Trial
Phase 3, ARMANI
Doi
https://doi.org/10.55788/c6d7cfdb
Modest improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reported for patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer and low/absent PD-L1 expression who switched their consolidation maintenance or early second-line therapy from CAPOX/FOLFOX to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel. However, toxicities were higher, and if patients would progress they would enter third-line therapy.

The past year has seen 5 new approvals for G/GEJ cancer treatments, all biomarker-driven, leaving patients without these markers in need of alternative strategies. About 40% of patients with locally advanced or metastatic G/GEJ cancer never reach second-line therapy, making the initial treatment phase critical. Dr Giovanni Randon (Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Italy) presented a potential strategy for patients with HER2-negative advanced G/GEJ cancer from the randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 3 ARMANI trial (NCT02934464) [1].

ARMANI randomised 280 patients who showed no disease progression after 3 months of initial oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy to receive either ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (8 mg/kg on days 1 and 15) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and every 28 days thereafter) (Arm A) or to continue with CAPOX/FOLFOX for another 3 months, followed by fluoropyrimidine monotherapy maintenance (Arm B). The primary endpoint was PFS difference between the 2 arms [2].

The median PFS was 6.6 months in Arm A compared with 3.5 months in Arm B (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.49–0.81; P<0.001). Median OS was 12.6 months in Arm A versus 10.4 months in Arm B (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58–0.97; P=0.030). However, grade 3 or higher neuropathy and other toxicities were more common in Arm A.

An exploratory biomarker analysis showed no significant interaction between CLDN18 status, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) <5, and treatment outcomes. Positive CLDN18 expression was found in 35% of the participants, and 40% had PD-L1 CPS ≥5. In the subgroup with CLDN18-negative status and PD-L1 CPS <5 (34% of the participants), the median PFS was 7.5 versus 4.2 months in Arm A and B, respectively (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.41–1.18; P=0.179).

These findings suggest that switching to ramucirumab and paclitaxel maintenance may prolong survival across various clinical and molecular subgroups. However, the increased toxicities, patients’ quality-of-life, and the implication of already having used 2 lines of therapy if patients progress must be considered when deciding on this treatment approach.

  1. Randon G, et al. Switch maintenance with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus continuation of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer: Final results and key biomarkers of the ARMANI phase 3 trial. Abstract LBA4, ESMO Gastrointestinal Cancers Congress 2024, 26–29 June, Munich, Germany.
  2. Di Bartolomeo M, et al. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):283.

Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on