The PROfound trial compared the efficacy of the poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib with the physician’s choice of new hormonal agent treatment with enzalutamide or abiraterone. Cohort A patients had alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM genes while those in Cohort B had alterations in any of 12 other genes known to be involved in DNA repair. Targeting DNA repair pathways in cancer cells is already used to treat breast and ovarian cancer in patients with mistakes in two DNA repair genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Changes in other genes that are involved in DNA repair, such as ATM, can also make cancer cells more susceptible to PARP inhibitors.
In Cohort A, median progression-free survival was 7.39 months with olaparib compared with 3.55 months for hormonal treatment (HR 0.34; P<0.0001). In the overall population (Cohort A+B), median progression-free survival was 5.82 vs 3.52 months respectively (HR 0.49; P<0.0001).
Although insufficient deaths had occurred for a conclusive result, interim overall survival analysis in Cohort A showed that median overall survival was 18.5 months with olaparib compared with 15.1 with hormonal treatment (HR 0.64; P=0.0173). Median overall survival in the overall population (Cohort A+B) was 17.5 vs 14.3 months (HR 0.67; P=0.0063) with olaparib vs hormonal treatment respectively. Adverse events were more common with olaparib than with hormonal treatment, though median treatment duration was longer with olaparib (7.4 months) than with hormone treatment (3.9 months). In the olaparib group, 16.4% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, compared with 8.5% on hormonal treatment.
Commenting on the PROfound data, Dr Eleni Efstathiou (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA) said: “This is a landmark trial, as it is the first phase 3 trial looking specifically at tumours harbouring a targetable molecular alteration. In patients with such tumours, treatment with olaparib resulted in a 66% greater delay in progression than the new hormonal agents which were used in PROfound. This is impressive because it is considerably higher than the 35-40% improvements with which we have been very satisfied in previous prostate cancer studies, in this more advanced disease setting. There is a trend towards improved survival, but we need to wait for the final analysis.”
- Hussain M et al. ESMO Congress 2019. Abstract LBA12_PR.
Posted on
Previous Article
« PFS extension with immunotherapy + chemotherapy in urothelial cancer Next Article
CDK4/6 inhibitors change landscape of breast cancer treatment: 2 studies »
« PFS extension with immunotherapy + chemotherapy in urothelial cancer Next Article
CDK4/6 inhibitors change landscape of breast cancer treatment: 2 studies »
Table of Contents: ESMO 2019
Featured articles
Interview with ESMO President Prof. Josep Tabernero
Breast Cancer
Triple negative breast cancer gets positive news: KEYNOTE-522 interim results
CDK4/6 inhibitors change landscape of breast cancer treatment: 2 studies
Veliparib-chemo combo prolongs survival without disease progression in some advanced breast cancer patients
Lung Cancer
Improved response rates without survival benefit with pembrolizumab in pretreated mesothelioma
Frontline ipilimumab/nivolumab improves OS in advanced NCLSC
First-line osimertinib significantly lengthens OS in NSCLC
Liquid biopsy to decide the best treatment for NSCLC
Melanoma
Long-term data from CheckMate 067
Adjuvant nivolumab provides benefit
Nivolumab+ipilimumab superior to monotherapy for melanoma brain metastases
GI Cancers
Preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer
Nivolumab improves OS in advanced oesophageal cancer
Liquid biopsy identifies relapse in patients with colorectal cancer after surgery
In hepatocellular carcinoma, CheckMate 459 misses OS endpoint, but some interesting trends emerge
Heavily pre-treated GIST: ripretinib improves PFS
FGFR2+ cholangiocarcinoma: pemigatinib active as second-line treatment
IDH1+ cholangiocarcinoma: phase 3 results show improved PFS
Advanced colorectal cancer and BRAF mutations: triplet combination improves survival
Genitourinary Cancers
25% reduction in the risk of death in patients with nmCRPC treated with apalutamide
Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in advanced bladder cancer: initial results
PARP inhibition in selected patients slows progression on advanced prostate cancer
PFS extension with immunotherapy + chemotherapy in urothelial cancer
Third-line in mCRPC: CARD trial
Prostate cancer: spare radiotherapy after surgery
Novel mode of action for kidney cancer treatment
Gynaecological Cancers
Ovarian cancer patients benefit from combined maintenance therapy
Combination of PARP inhibition plus chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
PFS benefit with niraparib as first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer
CNS Tumours
Ceritinib in ALK+ NSCLC brain metastases
Solid Tumours/Pan-Tumour Data
Mixed data: AMG 510 in tumours with KRASG12C
DNA profiling of carcinoma of unknown primary should inform treatment
Larotrectinib: safe and effective in TRK fusion-positive tumours
Related Articles
November 26, 2019
Letter from the Editor
November 26, 2019
Long-term data from CheckMate 067
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com