Prof. Matthew Smith (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA) presented the final MFS analysis and the second interim analysis for overall survival. Not surprisingly, the MFS benefit was sustained. The fist interim analysis was reported last year at ESMO 2018. In this year’s longer median follow-up of 41 months, 4-year overall survival (OS) rates were 72.1% for patients treated with apalutamide and 64.7% for patients treated with placebo, but this was not quite significant. Overall, a 25% reduction in the risk of death was observed for patients receiving apalutamide compared with placebo (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; P=0.0197; to reach statistical significance in their model, a P-value of P<0.0121 was predetermined as the the O’Brien-Fleming boundary). The OS benefit of apalutamide was consistent across baseline subgroups, including race, prior treatments, baseline PSA and performance status.
This current interim analysis took place when 67% of the required OS events had been observed, as opposed to last year when only 24% of required OS events had occurred (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.47-1.04; P=0.07). After unblinding of the study and prior to the second interim analysis, 76 non-progressing patients in the placebo group (19% of the placebo arm) crossed over to open-label apalutamide; the OS rates in the placebo group included those patients who crossed-over to apalutamide treatment. The third and final OS analysis will occur in 2022 at 427 (100%) events.
The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events for apalutamide at the second interim analysis were consistent with rates previously reported. The most common adverse events (≥10%) were fatigue, hypertension, rash, diarrhoea, nausea, weight loss, arthralgia, falls, hot flush, decreased appetite, fracture, and peripheral oedema.
The exploratory progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) analysis, where patients were followed from randomisation beyond the initial progression on either apalutamide or placebo until the second progression, confirmed a clinical benefit (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.45-0.68; P<0.0001, see Figure).
Figure. Results of time to second objective disease progression (PFS2) from the SPARTAN study.
(provided by ESMO)
In summary, although the OS data is still not statistically significant at this time, the study will continue to follow the patients on the trial. Regardless of the ultimate results from the future final OS analysis, this data supports treating patients with high risk M0 CRPC with apalutamide, given the confirmed MFS benefit from the primary endpoint analysis.
- Smith MR et al. ESMO Congress 2019. Abstract 8430.
- Small EJ et al. Ann Oncol. 2019 Sep 27.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer Next Article
Ovarian cancer patients benefit from combined maintenance therapy »
« Preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer Next Article
Ovarian cancer patients benefit from combined maintenance therapy »
Table of Contents: ESMO 2019
Featured articles
Interview with ESMO President Prof. Josep Tabernero
Breast Cancer
Triple negative breast cancer gets positive news: KEYNOTE-522 interim results
CDK4/6 inhibitors change landscape of breast cancer treatment: 2 studies
Veliparib-chemo combo prolongs survival without disease progression in some advanced breast cancer patients
Lung Cancer
Improved response rates without survival benefit with pembrolizumab in pretreated mesothelioma
Frontline ipilimumab/nivolumab improves OS in advanced NCLSC
First-line osimertinib significantly lengthens OS in NSCLC
Liquid biopsy to decide the best treatment for NSCLC
Melanoma
Long-term data from CheckMate 067
Adjuvant nivolumab provides benefit
Nivolumab+ipilimumab superior to monotherapy for melanoma brain metastases
GI Cancers
Preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer
Nivolumab improves OS in advanced oesophageal cancer
Liquid biopsy identifies relapse in patients with colorectal cancer after surgery
In hepatocellular carcinoma, CheckMate 459 misses OS endpoint, but some interesting trends emerge
Heavily pre-treated GIST: ripretinib improves PFS
FGFR2+ cholangiocarcinoma: pemigatinib active as second-line treatment
IDH1+ cholangiocarcinoma: phase 3 results show improved PFS
Advanced colorectal cancer and BRAF mutations: triplet combination improves survival
Genitourinary Cancers
25% reduction in the risk of death in patients with nmCRPC treated with apalutamide
Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in advanced bladder cancer: initial results
PARP inhibition in selected patients slows progression on advanced prostate cancer
PFS extension with immunotherapy + chemotherapy in urothelial cancer
Third-line in mCRPC: CARD trial
Prostate cancer: spare radiotherapy after surgery
Novel mode of action for kidney cancer treatment
Gynaecological Cancers
Ovarian cancer patients benefit from combined maintenance therapy
Combination of PARP inhibition plus chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
PFS benefit with niraparib as first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer
CNS Tumours
Ceritinib in ALK+ NSCLC brain metastases
Solid Tumours/Pan-Tumour Data
Mixed data: AMG 510 in tumours with KRASG12C
DNA profiling of carcinoma of unknown primary should inform treatment
Larotrectinib: safe and effective in TRK fusion-positive tumours
Related Articles
November 26, 2019
PFS benefit with niraparib as first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer
November 26, 2019
Third-line in mCRPC: CARD trial
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com