https://doi.org/10.55788/6b0b66bf
“Although MRI, PET, and scintigraphy are useful instruments for diagnostic purposes, there is a need for a complementary, more available, and cost-effective method to differentiate between PD, atypical parkinsonism (AP), and essential tremor (ET),” explained Dr Markus Stiehm (Skåne University Hospital, Sweden). The current retrospective study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of a substantia nigra-positive finding through transcranial ultrasound in patients with newly diagnosed parkinsonism [1].
The study included 72 patients with suspected parkinsonism who were referred for transcranial ultrasound. The findings from the initial test were compared with the final diagnosis after a long-term follow-up; the mean follow-up duration was 95.6 months. Dr Stiehm added that all final diagnoses were reviewed by an experienced neurologist and that nuclear imaging results could be analysed for this purpose.
The observed sensitivity of transcranial ultrasound for diagnosing PD versus non-PD appeared to be limited, at 73.21%. However, the specificity (87.50%) and positive predictive value (95.35%) were promising. “Transcranial ultrasound does not appear to be suitable as a single first-line diagnostic tool, due to the limited sensitivity,” argued Dr Stiehm. “It can however be regarded as a non-invasive, cost-effective, complementary diagnostic method, potentially sparing the use of expensive nuclear imaging techniques in some patients.” Large prospective studies with longer follow-up time are needed to gain further insights into the usefulness and reproducibility of transcranial ultrasound.
- Stiehm M, et al. The diagnostic value of transcranial ultrasound in Swedish Parkinsonism patients: a retrospective cohort study including a long follow-up period. Late-breaking session 1, 10th EAN Congress, 29 June–2 July 2024, Helsinki, Finland.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« How to achieve goal-concordant care in severe acute brain injury? Next Article
Novel tool to predict outcomes in anti-NMDAR encephalitis »
« How to achieve goal-concordant care in severe acute brain injury? Next Article
Novel tool to predict outcomes in anti-NMDAR encephalitis »
Table of Contents: EAN 2024
Featured articles
Extended success for N-acetyl-L-leucine in Niemann-Pick disease type C
Treatment escalation and de-escalation in late-onset MS
Diagnostics and Disease Management in Neurology
What is the value of transcranial ultrasound for diagnosing Parkinson’s disease?
How to achieve goal-concordant care in severe acute brain injury?
Changing treatment landscape in myasthenia gravis
Stroke and Vascular Events
High risk for recurrent vascular events in young stroke patients
Anticoagulation or antiplatelet as secondary prevention for cancer-related strokes?
Multiple Sclerosis
Treatment escalation and de-escalation in late-onset MS
How different are late onset and adult onset MS really?
Advances in Neurostimulation
Vagal nerve stimulation for the reduction of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain: state-of-affairs in 2024
Innovations in VNS and DBS for refractory epilepsy
Genetic and Molecular Therapies
Extended success for N-acetyl-L-leucine in Niemann-Pick disease type C
Therapeutic advancement in spinal muscular atrophy
Therapeutic advancement in Pompe disease
Neurological Risk Factors and Predictive Tools
Under investigation: Opioid use and the risk for dementia
Novel tool to predict outcomes in anti-NMDAR encephalitis
Related Articles
June 16, 2022
Roche’s study flop marks yet another Alzheimer’s setback
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com