https://doi.org/10.55788/74b325cf
“Although a [previously published] phase 1/2 trial study showed promising efficacy data of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RR CLL, the follow-up duration of this trial was limited to 1 year,” said Dr Emily Liang (University of Washington, WA, USA) [1,2]. To assess the long-term outcomes, the participants of the current phase 2 trial were followed for a median duration of 79.6 months. The study included 55 patients with ibrutinib-intolerant RR CLL who received 1 of 3 dose levels of JCAR014 CAR T-cell therapy [2]. In total, 49 participants were infused.
The 28-day overall response rate was 70%. Similarly, 28-day minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10-4) was achieved by 70% of the patients. Of the patients that reached MRD negativity by flow cytometry (10-4), 62% even reached MRD negativity by next-generation sequencing (10-6).
The median duration of response was 18.9 months, and the 6-year duration of response rate was 26%. The median duration of response was significantly longer in patients who had MRD negativity (10-4) at day 28 compared with MRD-positive patients (27.1 months vs 1.8 months; Plog-rank<0.001). This difference was even larger in patients with next-generation sequencing MRD-negativity (53.4 months vs 7.8 months; Plog-rank=0.004). Finally, the 6-year progression-free survival and 6-year overall survival rates were 18% and 31%, respectively.
These findings indicate that CD19 CAR T-cell therapy could be a viable option in heavily pre-treated patients with ibrutinib-intolerant RR CLL. “After 6 years of follow-up, 6 patients remained progression-free, suggesting that CD19 CAR T-cell therapy may even be curative in a subset of patients,” Dr Liang concluded.
- Gauthier J, et al. Blood. 2020;135(19):1650–1660.
- Liang EC, et al. Factors associated with duration of response after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory CLL: 6-year follow-up update. GS02-06, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) 49th Annual Meeting, 23–26 April 2023, Paris, France.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Can molecular data improve prognostication in MDS patients undergoing HSCT? Next Article
EULAR 2023 Highlights Podcast »
« Can molecular data improve prognostication in MDS patients undergoing HSCT? Next Article
EULAR 2023 Highlights Podcast »
Table of Contents: EBMT 2023
Featured articles
CAR T cells rise to the front in multiple myeloma
Acute Leukaemia
Quizartinib plus chemotherapy improves OS in patients with AML undergoing ASCT
Blinatumomab may improve outcomes in patients with B-cell ALL undergoing ASCT
Is ASCT a reasonable option in patients with invasive aspergillosis?
Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A in AML
Promising novel target identified for AML
Multiple Myeloma
Ide-cel superior to standard therapies in triple-class exposed RRMM
ASCT or CAR T cell as first-line therapy for MM?
DETERMINATION: Does one size fit all in multiple myeloma?
Graft-Versus-Host Disease
New options to treat steroid-refractory chronic GvHD
New developments in steroid-refractory acute GvHD
Miscellaneous Topics
Long-term success for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in CLL
Can molecular data improve prognostication in MDS patients undergoing HSCT?
Next-generation cell therapies for cancer: CAR-NK cells
Novel drugs and strategies around ASCT for Hodgkin lymphoma
Thalassaemia: Advances in conventional transplantation and gene therapy
Related Articles
July 1, 2021
EHA 2021 Highlights Podcast
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com