Dr Jarieke Hoogendoorn (Leiden University Medical Centre, the Netherlands) presented the results of a multicentre, retrospective study aimed to discriminate between patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and ARVC using electrocardiogram (ECG) [1]. Cardiac sarcoidosis with right ventricular involvement may mimic ARVC. Thus, Dr Hoogendoorn and colleagues hypothesised that the histopathologic differences between the diseases would result in different specific right ventricular activation patterns detectable on ECG. In ARVC, scar tissue progresses from epicardium to endocardium and may lead to delayed activation of areas with reduced voltages with small amplitude on the ECG. In cardiac sarcoidosis, patchy transmural right ventricular scar tissue leads to conduction block and thus late activated areas with preserved voltages, reflected as preserved R-prime (R’)-waves in the right precordial leads.
This retrospective study included patients with cardiac sarcoidosis with right ventricular involvement (n=13) or gene-positive ARVC referred for ventricular tachycardia ablation (n=23). A non-ventricular-paced, 12-lead surface ECG prior to ablation was obtained and analysed using the Leiden ECG Analysis and Decomposition Software. Based on the hypothesis that conduction block in cardiac sarcoidosis leads to late activated areas with preserved voltages, the surface area of the R’-wave in V1-V3 was measured. An R’-wave was defined as any positive deflection from baseline after an S-wave.
An R’-wave in V1-V3 was present in all cardiac sarcoidosis patients compared with 11 (48%) of ARVC patients (P=0.002). The maximum R’-wave surface area in lead V1-V3 was 3.55 mm² in cardiac sarcoidosis (IQR 2.18-5.81) versus 0.00 mm² in ARVC (IQR 0.00-0.43; P<0.001). By ROC analysis, the maximum R’-wave surface area in lead V1-V3 was an excellent discriminator (AUC 0.980; 95% CI 0.945-1.000). A cut-off of ≥1.65 mm² had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 96% for diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis. This was validated in a second cohort including 18 cardiac sarcoidosis and 40 ARVC patients, with 72% sensitivity and 88% specificity [1].
Dr Hoogendoorn concluded that transmural right ventricular scars in cardiac sarcoidosis lead to a localised conduction block and thus to a large R’-wave. An easily applicable algorithm including a terminal S-wave and surface area maximum R’-wave in V1-V3 was shown to be a good discriminator between cardiac sarcoidosis and ARVC. The QRS terminal activation in precordial leads V1-V3 may reflect disease specific scar patterns.
- Hoogendorn J. The precordial R-prime wave: a novel discriminator between cardiac sarcoidosis and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia. EHRA 2021 Congress, 23-25 April.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Limited added value of ECG-based mortality prediction in COVID-19 patients using machine learning Next Article
Novel diagnostic score accurately differentiates between athlete’s heart and ARVC »
« Limited added value of ECG-based mortality prediction in COVID-19 patients using machine learning Next Article
Novel diagnostic score accurately differentiates between athlete’s heart and ARVC »
Table of Contents: EHRA 2021
Featured articles
Atrial Fibrillation and Direct Oral Anticoagulant
Predictors of young-onset atrial fibrillation
RACE 3 long-term results show fading benefit of targeted therapies in AF and HF
Deep dive into EAST-AFNET 4 results on early rhythm-control in atrial fibrillation
Cryo-FIRST study: improved AF and QoL outcomes with cryoballoon versus drug therapy
STROKESTOP: Benefits of systematic screening for atrial fibrillation
DOACs and bleeding: the role of antidotes
2021 EHRA practical guide: DOACs in pre-operative and bleeding patients
Atrial Ablation
Early rhythm-control ablation: insight from the CHARISMA registry
Personalised pulmonary vein isolation procedure feasible and effective
Pulmonary vein isolation: cryoballoon non-inferior to radiofrequency ablation
Diagnostic Tools
EHRA Practical Guide on cardiac imaging in electrophysiology
Novel diagnostic score accurately differentiates between athlete’s heart and ARVC
The precordial R-prime wave: a discriminator between cardiac sarcoidosis and ARVC
Limited added value of ECG-based mortality prediction in COVID-19 patients using machine learning
Devices
EHRA expert statement on pacemakers and intracardial devices: “watch out for the little old lady”
5-Year efficacy of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Specific Populations
Individualised approaches key to success in resynchronisation therapy non-responders
Antiarrhythmic drug treatment in children: evidence-based recommendations
The importance of cardiac imaging in patients with congenital heart disease
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com