The OPTION trial (NCT03795298) assessed LAAC and OAC in patients with AF who underwent ablation and were at a moderate-to-high risk of stroke [1,2]. Participants with AF indicated for ablation (n=1,600) were randomised 1:1 to ablation plus LAAC (WATCHMAN FLX) or ablation plus OAC. “Patients in the LAAC arm received OAC plus aspirin for 3 months after which they continued on aspirin only,” added Prof. Oussama Wazni (Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA) [1]. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months, which was tested for non-inferiority. The primary safety endpoint was non-procedural ISTH major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding at 36 months, which was tested for superiority. “About 95% of the patients on OACs received direct OACs [DOACs],” said Prof. Wazni.
At 36 months, ablation plus LAAC was non-inferior to ablation plus OAC for efficacy, with incidence rates of 5.3% and 5.8%, respectively (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.59–1.39; Pnon-inferiority<0.0001). In terms of the primary safety endpoint, ablation plus LAAC was superior to ablation plus OAC, with rates of 8.5% and 18.1% (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.33–0.59; P<0.0001).
“WATCHMAN FLX is a safe and effective first-line option for patients with AF undergoing ablation,” concluded Prof. Wazni. “Interestingly, 40% of the patients in the study received a concomitant ablation and LAAC procedure, potentially reducing AF burden, the risk for stroke, and the risk for bleeding in one procedure.”
- Wazni OM, et al. Randomized comparison of left atrial appendage closure with oral anticoagulation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. LBS.02, AHA Scientific Sessions 2024, 16–18 November, Chicago, USA.
- Wazni OM, et al. N Engl J Med 2024; Nov 16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2408308.
Medical writing support was provided by Robert van den Heuvel.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« CLEAR SYNERGY: Can routine spironolactone improve post-MI outcomes? Next Article
Novel small-interfering RNA effectively reduced Lp(a) in phase 2 »
« CLEAR SYNERGY: Can routine spironolactone improve post-MI outcomes? Next Article
Novel small-interfering RNA effectively reduced Lp(a) in phase 2 »
Table of Contents: AHA 2024
Featured articles
SUMMIT: Tirzepatide reduces cardiovascular events in HFpEF plus obesity
Online First
VANISH2: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation in MI plus VT?
KRAKEN: Encouraging phase 2 results of Lp(a) lowering muvalaplin
Comparing dual antihypertensive combination therapies in a South Asian population
Novel small-interfering RNA effectively reduced Lp(a) in phase 2
OPTION: LAAC over OAC after ablation in patients with AF and increased stroke risk
CLEAR SYNERGY: Can routine spironolactone improve post-MI outcomes?
Head-to-head: Cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation in persistent AF
Reconditioned pacemakers may save lives in low/middle-income countries
ARREST-AF: The true impact of risk factor management on AF recurrence after ablation
REALIZE-K: MRA treatment optimisation in HFrEF plus hyperkalaemia
SUMMIT: Tirzepatide reduces cardiovascular events in HFpEF plus obesity
BPROAD: Intensive or standard BP treatment strategy in type 2 diabetes?
Promising results for CRISPR-based therapy in ATTR-CM
GLORIOUS: GLP-1 agonist did not meet primary endpoint in CABG
ENBALV: Edoxaban or warfarin as anticoagulant after bioprosthetic valve replacement?
Related Articles
November 19, 2024
FcRn blocker nipocalimab improves disease activity in Sjögren’s disease
November 22, 2024
ACR presents new guideline for lupus nephritis
November 18, 2024
BPROAD: Intensive or standard BP treatment strategy in type 2 diabetes?
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com