From 2012 to 2020, adult patients with localised RCC, no metastatic disease, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and at least one post-SABR eGFR at six months or later were analysed. Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. The primary outcome was freedom from severe to end-stage CKD, determined using the Kaplan–Meier estimator.
Cox proportional hazard models assessed the impact of baseline CKD, age, hypertension, diabetes, tumour size, and fractionation schedule. Seventy-eight consecutive patients (median age: 77.8 years; tumour size: 4.5 cm) with a median follow-up of 42.2 months were included. The baseline median eGFR was 58 mL/min, with 55% of patients having baseline CKD stage 3. By the last follow-up, 2.8% of baseline CKD 1–2, 25.9% CKD 3a, and 68.8% CKD 3b patients had developed CKD stage 4–5. The estimated probability of freedom from CKD stage 4–5 at 1 and 5 years was 89.6% and 65%, respectively. Univariable analysis revealed worse baseline CKD (P<0.0001) and multi-fraction SABR (P=0.005) as predictive of stage 4–5 CKD, with only the former remaining significant in the multivariable model.
In conclusion, SABR demonstrated satisfactory nephron sparing and acceptable rates of severe to end-stage CKD in this elderly cohort with pre-existing renal dysfunction, making it a viable option for medically inoperable patients.
Reference: Ali, M et al. Radiat Oncol. 2024;19(1):23
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02413-w
Originally Published by Physician’s Weekly. Reused by Medicom Medical Publishers with permission.©2024 Physician’s Weekly. All rights reserved. No works may be reproduced without expressed written consent from Physician’s Weekly. Inquire about licensing here. No article should be construed as medical advice and is not intended as such by the authors or by Physician’s Weekly.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Comparing standard and modified ipilimumab with nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma treatment Next Article
CircPRELID2 promotes renal cell carcinoma via miR-22-3p/ETV1 cascade »
« Comparing standard and modified ipilimumab with nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma treatment Next Article
CircPRELID2 promotes renal cell carcinoma via miR-22-3p/ETV1 cascade »
Related Articles
August 31, 2021
Worse renal function after radical versus partial nephrectomy
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com