Home > Nephrology > Comparing standard and modified ipilimumab with nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma treatment

Comparing standard and modified ipilimumab with nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma treatment

Physician’s Weekly – 30/01/2024 – For a randomised phase II trial, researchers sought to assess whether administering ipilimumab once every 12 weeks (modified schedule) in combination with nivolumab would result in a more favourable toxicity profile compared to the standard schedule of once every 3 weeks in treatment-naïve patients with intermediate- or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). 

Treatment-naïve patients with clear-cell aRCC were randomly assigned to receive either modified or standard ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) in combination with nivolumab (3 mg/kg). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse event (AE) among those who received at least one therapy dose. The key secondary endpoint was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) in the modified arm compared with a historical sunitinib control. The study was not designed to compare arms for efficacy formally. 

Between March 2018 and January 2020, 192 patients were enrolled. The incidence of grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs was significantly lower in participants receiving modified ipilimumab than standard ipilimumab (32.8% vs. 53.1%; odds ratio, 0.43 [90% CI, 0.25 to 0.72]; P =0.0075). The 12-month PFS (90% CI) using modified ipilimumab was 46.1% (38.6 to 53.2%). At a median follow-up of 21 months, the overall response rate was 45.3%, with a median PFS of 10.8 months. 

The study concluded that the modified ipilimumab schedule was associated with significantly lower rates of grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs. Although the 12-month PFS did not meet the prespecified efficacy threshold compared to historical control, there was no apparent reduction in efficacy with the modified schedule in the informal comparison of treatment groups. 

Reference: Vasudev, NS et al. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(3):312-323 

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00236  

Originally Published by Physician’s Weekly. Reused by Medicom Medical Publishers with permission.©2024 Physician’s Weekly. All rights reserved. No works may be reproduced without expressed written consent from Physician’s Weekly. Inquire about licensing here. No article should be construed as medical advice and is not intended as such by the authors or by Physician’s Weekly. 



Posted on