PVI is the standard of care for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The innovation in this field mainly focuses on lesion durability and improved energy sources. Recent clinical trials have shown an >80% success rate at 1 year [2-4]. However, in persistent AF, PVI is not particularly effective and non-PV drivers as mechanisms for persistent AF are postulated.
To approach these non-PV targets, several PVI+ ablation strategies have been developed: an anatomical approach including linear lesions, ganglionic plexi ablation, and non-PV trigger ablation or isolation, and, with significant overlap, a targeted approach including ganglionic plexi ablation, non-PV trigger ablation or isolation, and locally-guided ablation. Dr Tom De Potter (Cardiovascular Research Center Aalst, Belgium) provided an overview of the clinical evidence of these approaches [1].
Linear lesions are the most well studied of these approaches and most of the related single-centre studies show a trend towards benefit. However, a recent, large, multicentre, randomised study showed that PVI alone was not inferior to PVI plus linear lesions [5]. More recently, ablation shifted towards posterior wall isolation, which is achievable in most cases with a low procedural risk and good 12-month outcomes as shown by a retrospective meta-analysis. However, statistical analysis of randomised clinical trials did not show superiority of PVI+ posterior wall isolation [6].
Percutaneous linear cryoablation is another strategy to facilitate Cox-maze-like lesions. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of this method, a first-in-man study (NCT02839304) has been conducted. Results showed an 84% success rate after 12 months in patients with paroxysmal AF and a similarly good efficacy of 82% success rate with a good safety profile in patients with persistent AF (n=60). Dr De Potter also introduced anatomical alcohol ablation, for which benefit over PVI has been suggested, and left atrial appendage isolation, for which no results are available yet [7-9].
Targeted ablation focuses on a leading circle concept with multiple or random re-entrant wavelets, which can be observed in real-time. Different approaches have been published for targeted ablation. For example, using atrial mapping, panoramic non-invasive and invasive mapping. Several mapping systems are currently being researched [10], confirmation of efficacy in a randomised trial is not available yet.
Dr de Potter emphasised the inter-patient variability in AF and significant inter-observer variability in target identification. Machine learning could be of high potential to enhance target identification, i.e. pattern recognition algorithms may overcome interpretation issues [11].
In conclusion, non-PV ablation targets are of significant interest not only for the very large persistent AF population but also for the heart failure population and in patients with recurrent AF after PVI. Randomised clinical trials are available, ongoing, or planned for anatomical and targeted PVI+ strategies [11].
- De Potter T. Strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation lesions. EHRA 2021 Congress, 23-25 April.
- Nielsen JC, et al. Heart 2017:103(5):368-376.
- Kaba RA, et al. Clob Card Sci Pract 2014(2):53-55.
- Duytschaever M, et al. Eur Heart J 2018:39(16):1429-1437.
- Terricabras M, et al. JAMA Netw Open 2020: 3(12):e2025473.
- Thiyagarajah A, et al. Circ Arrhythm EP 2019:12:e007005.
- Derval N, et al. Hearth Rhythm 2021:18:529-537.
- Velderrabano M, et al. JAMA 2020:324:1620-1628.
- Romero J, et al. Europace 2018:20(8):1268-1278.
- Tomassoni G, JACC Clin EP 2017:3(3):217-219.
- De Potter T, et al. Hearth Rhythm 2017:14:5:173.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Predictors of young-onset atrial fibrillation Next Article
Pulmonary vein isolation: cryoballoon non-inferior to radiofrequency ablation »
« Predictors of young-onset atrial fibrillation Next Article
Pulmonary vein isolation: cryoballoon non-inferior to radiofrequency ablation »
Table of Contents: EHRA 2021
Featured articles
Atrial Fibrillation and Direct Oral Anticoagulant
Predictors of young-onset atrial fibrillation
RACE 3 long-term results show fading benefit of targeted therapies in AF and HF
Deep dive into EAST-AFNET 4 results on early rhythm-control in atrial fibrillation
Cryo-FIRST study: improved AF and QoL outcomes with cryoballoon versus drug therapy
STROKESTOP: Benefits of systematic screening for atrial fibrillation
DOACs and bleeding: the role of antidotes
2021 EHRA practical guide: DOACs in pre-operative and bleeding patients
Atrial Ablation
Early rhythm-control ablation: insight from the CHARISMA registry
Personalised pulmonary vein isolation procedure feasible and effective
Pulmonary vein isolation: cryoballoon non-inferior to radiofrequency ablation
Diagnostic Tools
EHRA Practical Guide on cardiac imaging in electrophysiology
Novel diagnostic score accurately differentiates between athlete’s heart and ARVC
The precordial R-prime wave: a discriminator between cardiac sarcoidosis and ARVC
Limited added value of ECG-based mortality prediction in COVID-19 patients using machine learning
Devices
EHRA expert statement on pacemakers and intracardial devices: “watch out for the little old lady”
5-Year efficacy of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Specific Populations
Individualised approaches key to success in resynchronisation therapy non-responders
Antiarrhythmic drug treatment in children: evidence-based recommendations
The importance of cardiac imaging in patients with congenital heart disease
Related Articles
June 16, 2021
Predictors of young-onset atrial fibrillation
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com