https://doi.org/10.55788/596d5413
“Despite the availability of effective therapies, many patients with hypertension do not achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure targets, leaving them at an unattended risk for cardiovascular events,” said Dr Akshay Desai (Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA, USA) [1]. In part, this may be due to poor adherence to complex multidrug oral treatment regimens.
Zilebesiran, an investigational RNA interference therapeutic, significantly reduced 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP at 3 months with a single subcutaneous injection compared with placebo in the phase 2 KARDIA-1 study [2]. Building on this, the phase 2 KARDIA-2 study (NCT05103332) aimed to assess zilebesiran’s efficacy in combination with standard-of-care anti-hypertensive therapy [1].
The study enrolled 1,500 adults with mild-to-moderate hypertension, who were randomised to receive once-daily oral treatment with indapamide, amlodipine, or olmesartan as background therapy. Those with a 24-hour mean SBP of 130–160 mmHg for ≥4 weeks were further randomised to receive zilebesiran 600 mg or placebo as add-on therapy.
At 3 months, participants receiving zilebesiran with either indapamide, amlodipine, or olmesartan demonstrated statistically significant reductions in 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP and office SBP compared with placebo. The LS mean differences were -12.1 mmHg for zilebesiran + indapamide, -9.7 mmHg for zilebesiran + amlodipine, and -4.0 mmHg for zilebesiran + olmesartan (all with P<0.001; see Figure). At 6 months, reductions in office SBP remained significant (P<0.01 for all comparisons) for zilebesiran + indapamide (-13.6 mmHg), zilebesiran + amlodipine (-8.6 mmHg), and zilebesiran + olmesartan (-4.6 mmHg).
Figure: Change from baseline to month 3 in 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP [1]
CI, confidence interval; LSM, least-square mean; LSMD, LSM difference; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Safety analysis revealed a favourable profile for all combinations, with low incidences of adverse events (AEs) and rare serious AEs. Notably, hypotension/orthostatic hypotension occurred in 7 participants in each combination group but was resolved without intervention. A few participants experienced >30% reduction in eGFR, primarily in the first 3 months, which resolved upon repeat measurement.
“Although our trial was not adequately powered nor of sufficient duration to ensure long-term safety and efficacy, these results do appear to support the potential for combining biannual dosing of zilebesiran with standard-of-care or any hypertensives to achieve additive blood pressure reductions,” concluded Dr Desai.
- Bakris GL, et al. Zilebesiran in Combination with a Standard-of-care Antihypertensive in Patients with Inadequately Controlled Hypertension: Primary Results from the Phase 2 KARDIA-2 Study. LB2, Session 405, ACC 2024 Scientific Session, 6–8 April, Atlanta, USA.
- Bakris GL, et al. JAMA. 2024;331(9):740-749.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« BRIDGE-TIMI 73a: Olezarsen halves triglyceride levels Next Article
Preventive PCI of vulnerable intracoronary plaque leads to favourable outcomes »
« BRIDGE-TIMI 73a: Olezarsen halves triglyceride levels Next Article
Preventive PCI of vulnerable intracoronary plaque leads to favourable outcomes »
Table of Contents: ACC 2024
Featured articles
Matters of the heart: late-breaking news from the American College of Cardiology
Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathy
STEP-HFpEF DM: Semaglutide beneficial in patients with HFpEF and diabetes
IMPROVE-HCM: Promising results for ninerafaxstat in non-obstructive HCM
Acute Coronary Syndrome and Acute Myocardial Infarction
ACS: Necessary DAPT after PCI may be shorter than currently advised
AEGIS-II: ApoA-1 did not reduce MACE in patients with myocardial infarction but may provide benefit in patients with high LDL levels
REDUCE-AMI: Re-evaluating the role of routine beta-blockade in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Interventional Cardiology in 2024
Self-expanding versus balloon-expendable TAVR in patients with small aortic annuli
Safety of TAVI non-inferior to SAVR for patients with lower surgical risk
Interatrial shunt for HF: neutral primary endpoint but potential benefit in HFrEF
Peripheral artery disease: procedure-guidance by IVUS superior to angiography
IVUS-guided PCI beats angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome
Addressing frailty in patients undergoing TAVR
Novel Developments in Risk Factor Management
Preventive PCI of vulnerable intracoronary plaque leads to favourable outcomes
KARDIA-2: Add-on zilebesiran effectively lowers blood pressure
BRIDGE-TIMI 73a: Olezarsen halves triglyceride levels
Plozasiran: A novel approach to severe hypertriglyceridaemia
High-risk and very high-risk patients meet LDL-cholesterol targets with lerodalcibep
No cardioprotective effect of ACE inhibitors in patients with cancer
Best of Posters
SGLT2 inhibition in heart failure more advantageous for women than men
Anxiety and depression: Lifestyle influential in MACE prevention
Meet the Trialists
Related Articles
November 2, 2020
Myocardial recovery common with LVADs
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com