The FDA-approved drug methotrexate is used to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis. It is believed to exert both antiproliferative and immunomodulatory effects and can be given either orally or subcutaneously. However, the route of administration of methotrexate has not been intensively studied for efficacy and side effects [1].
Therefore, Mr Ishan Agrawal (Siksha O Anusandhan University Bhubaneswar, India) and his team aimed to compare the effectiveness and side effects of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate in chronic plaque psoriasis. In a prospective, comparative, single-blinded study (CTRI/2020/07/026598), adult patients (n=100) were randomised to receive oral methotrexate or subcutaneous methotrexate weekly for 24 weeks. The starting dose was 7.5–10 mg/week and could be increased with 2.5mg/week mg monthly depending on clinical response. Psoriasis was assessed by different methods, including Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score, Medical Adherence Score (MAS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) with dermoscopic and photographic evaluation at monthly intervals.
The oral methotrexate and subcutaneous methotrexate group showed similar age distribution and 26% versus 30% women, respectively. At 24 weeks, the mean difference in PASI and PGA from baseline was not significant. MAS increased from baseline to week 24 in both groups (P<0.001), while DLQI decreased in both groups (P=0.039) with a larger difference for the subcutaneous group.
At 6 months of therapy, oral and subcutaneous methotrexate had similar efficacy. However, a faster decline in PGA at week 8 was seen for subcutaneous methotrexate. Both routes of administration did not show any side effects that have not previously been reported with methotrexate. Improved MAS and DLQI were seen for the subcutaneous route.
- Agrawal I, et al. A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study On The Efficacy And Safety Profile Of Oral Versus Subcutaneous Methotrexate In Patients Of Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis. Abstract 208. ICD 2021, 10-13 November 2021.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Expanding the toolbox: what is new in melanoma detection? Next Article
Age at disease onset: a key factor in understanding psoriasis »
« Expanding the toolbox: what is new in melanoma detection? Next Article
Age at disease onset: a key factor in understanding psoriasis »
Table of Contents: ICD 2021
Featured articles
Autologous serum therapy benefits chronic spontaneous urticaria
ICD Round-Up Articles
An unusual case of E. coli cellulitis in an immunocompetent patient
Autologous serum therapy benefits chronic spontaneous urticaria
Comparing routes of administration of methotrexate in psoriasis patients
Expanding the toolbox: what is new in melanoma detection?
Equity in dermatology: Skin Care For All
Challenges in diagnosis and treatment of leprosy in Brazil
A PASSION to provide dermatological care in LMICs
Paediatric dermatology in Tunisia: common diagnoses
Registry of vitiligo patients aims to break the stigma
10% thioglycolic acid gel peels: a safe and efficient option for pigmented purpuric dermatosis
Benefits of microneedling with platelet-rich plasma for acne scars
Related Articles
December 2, 2021
Ceramides and their role in skincare
December 2, 2021
Expanding the toolbox: what is new in melanoma detection?
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com