Head-to-head studies are needed to make informed treatment decisions. In the SEAVUE study (NCT03464136), biologic-naïve moderate-to-severe CD patients (n=386) were randomised to ustekinumab, an IL-12/23(p40) antagonist, or adalimumab, a TNF antagonist. Safety and efficacy of both therapies was assessed. Patients in the ustekinumab arm received 6 mg/kg ustekinumab, intravenously injected, followed by a subcutaneous dose of 90 mg every 8 weeks. Patients in the adalimumab arm received 4 doses of 40 mg adalimumab, subcutaneously injected, in the first 2 weeks, followed by 2 doses of 40 mg in week 2-4 of the study. Hereafter, these patients were administered 40 mg of adalimumab every 2 weeks. Clinical remission, defined as a Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score <150, was the primary endpoint of this trial. Dr Peter Irving (Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital, UK) presented the results [1].
There was no significant difference in clinical remission rates between adalimumab and ustekinumab at 52 weeks of follow-up (61.0% vs 64.9%; P=0.417). Major secondary endpoints confirmed this result. The number of patients in corticoid-free remission at 52 weeks was similar for the 2 arms (adalimumab 57.4% vs ustekinumab 60.7%). Endoscopic remission, defined as simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease (SES-CD) ≤3, did not show a significant difference in efficacy between adalimumab (30.7%) and ustekinumab (28.5%) in this population. Moreover, the 2 therapies demonstrated a similar pattern of increasing clinical remission rates over the course of the study.
The results of the safety analysis were consistent with prior experience for both medications. Among users of adalimumab, 77.9 % experienced at least one adverse event. Among ustekinumab recipients, adverse events were reported in 80.1%.
- Irving P M, et al. Ustekinumab versus adalimumab for induction and maintenance therapy in Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease: The SEAVUE study. OP02, ECCO 2021 Virtual Congress, 2-3 & 8-10 July.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Upadacitinib meets primary endpoint for moderate-to-severe UC Next Article
Blood proteins predicting relapse in CD identified »
« Upadacitinib meets primary endpoint for moderate-to-severe UC Next Article
Blood proteins predicting relapse in CD identified »
Table of Contents: ECCO 2021
Featured articles
Biologics Updates
Similar efficacy of ustekinumab and adalimumab for moderate-to-severe CD
Ustekinumab safe and effective in elderly CD patients
Early clinical remission and response following risankizumab therapy in CD
Risk of hospitalisation and surgery linked to IBD biological
Obesity increases the risk of immunogenicity to adalimumab in IBD
Improvements in Small Molecules
Upadacitinib meets primary endpoint for moderate-to-severe UC
Promising safety and pharmacokinetic data on BT051 for UC
Surgical closure plus anti-TNF outperforms anti-TNF alone for perianal fistula
Novel Biomarkers
Blood proteins predicting relapse in CD identified
Extracellular RNA has potential as a non-invasive biomarker in IBD
Risk Mitigation
No increased risk of (severe) COVID-19 among IBD patients
Oral faecal microbiota transplant therapy efficacious in UC
Artificial intelligence outperforms human classifying of endoscopic images in UC
Increased risk of rectal cancer after colectomy in IBD
Risk of colorectal cancer is detected by low-pass whole genome sequencing
Large variability in IBD care and education across Europe
Ultra-processed food intake associated with IBD
Factors of coping difficulties in IBD revealed
Related Articles
May 9, 2019
Topical review
September 28, 2021
Could steroid treatment speed recovery from infliximab-induced liver injury?
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com