“We and others have previously described the associations of gout flares and subsequent cardiovascular events,” said Dr Edoardo Cipolletta (Polytechnic University of Marche, Italy) [1]. His study aimed to evaluate the impact of achieving a serum urate treatment target of <360 μmol/l within the first year of treatment on the 5-year risk of MACE among patients with gout and newly prescribed ULT. The study included 116,518 patients from 2 major European cohorts, the UK CPRD Aurum and Sweden’s VEGA database.
Patients were classified into 2 groups: those achieving the serum urate target of <360 µmol/L urate within 12 months of ULT initiation (T2T-ULT) and those who did not (fire-and-forget). Patients in the fire-and-forget arm had either not any recorded SU measurements within 12 months after ULT initiation, or they had persistent SU levels >360 µmol/l in the 12 months after ULT initiation. All participants were matched for 40 baseline covariates, including demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and gout characteristics. The primary endpoint was the 5-year risk of MACE, defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death.
During a mean follow-up time of 3.45 in the UK and 2.62 years in the Swedish cohort, 13.77% (n=15,081) of UK patients and 15.97% (n=1,120) of Swedish patients experienced a MACE.
In the UK cohort, the 5-year weighted MACE-free survival was 89.43% (95% CI 88.97–89.89) in the T2T-ULT group versus 88.03% (95% CI 87.73–88.33) in the comparator group, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.86–0.89). In the Swedish VEGA-cohort, corresponding survival rates were 76.82% (95% CI 74.03–79.61) and 75.50% (95% CI 73.99–77.601), with an HR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.84–1.04).
A pooled analysis confirmed a higher 5-year MACE-free survival and a relative risk reduction of 6% to 11% in patients treated with the T2T strategy. Interestingly, there was an interaction between age and ULT strategies, as the effect size in people aged >65 years was significantly greater than in younger patients (P=0.02).
Furthermore, achieving the serum urate target was associated with fewer gout flares (IRR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92–0.99).
“The effect size is quite modest, but no additional harm exists for patients since this is already the recommended treatment strategy. The results support the usefulness and the validity of the T2T approach that extends beyond the joints,” Dr Cipolletta concluded.
- Cipolletta E. Cardiovascular outcomes of treat-to-target versus fire-and-forget urate-lowering treatment in gout: emulated target trial studies using linked English and Swedish primary care, hospitalisation and mortality data. OP0005, EULAR 2025, 11–14 June, Barcelona, Spain.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Obinutuzumab shows robust efficacy across different renal endpoints in lupus nephritis Next Article
ACPA positivity plus musculoskeletal pain does not equal clinical arthritis over time for all »
« Obinutuzumab shows robust efficacy across different renal endpoints in lupus nephritis Next Article
ACPA positivity plus musculoskeletal pain does not equal clinical arthritis over time for all »
Table of Contents: EULAR 2025
Featured articles
A novel compound emerging as a treatment for refractory gout
New Developments in Crystal-related Disorders
Targeting serum uric acid pays off: gout strategy cuts MACE
A novel compound emerging as a treatment for refractory gout
Osteoarthritis and Osteoporosis
Initiating glucocorticoids for rheumatic diseases: sequential romosozumab- denosumab treatment increases lumbar BMD
Rapid and clinically meaningful pain relief in knee OA with novel neurotrophin inhibitor
Best of the Posters
Air pollution may increase autoimmune risk through ANA positivity
Weight-bearing exercise contributes to bone health in inflammatory rheumatic diseases
Late-Breaking Abstracts
Combination of leflunomide and hydroxychloroquine reduces disease activity in Sjögren’s disease
Guselkumab slows joint damage progression in PsA
Deucravacitinib shows robust 16-week efficacy in biologic-naïve PsA participants
Arthritis in 2025
Preventive abatacept may delay RA diagnosis in at-risk populations
Patients with musculoskeletal pain and ACPA positivity: most progress to arthritis, but not always RA
Spotlight on Spondyloarthritis
Bone marrow oedema in axial spondyloarthritis: different patterns identified
Digital therapeutic Axia enhances outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis
What is New in Lupus, Scleroderma, and Myositis
Combination of rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil offers no superiority over monotherapy in SSc-related ILD
Early clinical events flag systemic sclerosis earlier than the classification criteria
New targeted therapy shows efficacy in inflammatory myopathy
Enpatoran shows encouraging signals in lupus, despite an unmet primary endpoint
Robust renal efficacy with obinutuzumab across key clinical criteria in lupus nephritis
Related Articles
September 4, 2019
Treat-to-target approach emerging in axial spondyloarthritis
December 1, 2022
Belimumab efficacious in cutaneous lupus erythematosus
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
