The safety and efficacy of VNS was studied in the randomised-controlled, phase 3 RESET-RA study (NCT04539964). The results were presented by Dr John Tesser (Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, AZ, USA) [1]. The 242 enrolled participants had previously failed treatment with at least 1 b/tsDMARD; they remained on stable background conventional DMARDs. Their mean age was 56 years; 86% were women, and mean RA duration was 12 years. Participants were randomised 1:1 to active or non-active (control) stimulation. The primary endpoint was achieving ACR20 response 12 weeks after informed consent. At that time, the study changed to an open-label design, allowing the control group could cross over to treatment. Efficacy was re-assessed at week 24.
ACR20 response at week 12 was significantly higher in the treatment group (35.2% vs 24.2% in controls; Δ11%; 95% CI 0.6–23.1; P=0.0209). In a prespecified analysis, ACR20 response at week 12 for patients with exposure to 1 prior bDMARD was 44.2% and 19.0%, respectively (Δ25.2%; 95% CI 7.1–43.3; P=0.0054). All secondary and exploratory endpoints trended in favour of the treatment group.
After crossover, at week 24, ACR20 response further increased to 51.5% and 53.1% in the treatment and control group, respectively. By that time, 81% of the participants were on VNS therapy alone and free of added b/tsDMARD. Overall, the safety profile was acceptable. Stimulation therapy specifically was well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event was mild to moderate hoarseness/vocal cord dysfunction. The rate of serious adverse events was 1.7% in the treatment group.
- Tesser J, et al. Neuroimmune modulation in adults with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs: Results at 12 and 24 weeks from a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind pivotal study. Abstract L10, ACR Convergence 2024, 14–19 November, Washington DC, USA.
Medical writing support was provided by Michiel Tent
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Dapirolizumab pegol reduces SLE activity and corticosteroid use Next Article
ACR presents new guideline for lupus nephritis »
« Dapirolizumab pegol reduces SLE activity and corticosteroid use Next Article
ACR presents new guideline for lupus nephritis »
Table of Contents: ACR 2024
Featured articles
ACR presents new guideline for lupus nephritis
T2T approach in women with RA can increase fertility
Online First
ACR presents new guideline for lupus nephritis
Positive results for vagus nerve stimulation in RA
Dapirolizumab pegol reduces SLE activity and corticosteroid use
NT-3 inhibitor relieves pain caused by osteoarthritis
Emapalumab rapidly controls MAS in patients with Still’s disease
Favourable benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib in giant cell arteritis
Global recruitment associated with higher placebo responses in PsA trials
TAPIR: Fully tapering off glucocorticosteroids may be a viable option for GPA
ICI therapy does not increase mortality risk in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease
XG005 relieves OA symptoms in phase 2b study
FcRn blocker nipocalimab improves disease activity in Sjögren’s disease
Anifrolumab more effective against organ damage than standard-of-care in SLE
T2T approach in women with RA can increase fertility
Post-hoc analysis of 3 large trials maps sex differences in PsA
Registry participation can enhance quality of rheumatology care
Related Articles
February 4, 2020
Treatment decisions should not be guided by ultrasound findings
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com