Pembrolizumab was the first anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy to improve survival in patients with metastatic NSCLC in first line [1]. At 5-year follow-up, 99/150 (66%) patients treated with chemotherapy had crossed over to pembrolizumab, whereas 80/154 (52%) of patients in the pembrolizumab group received subsequent anti-cancer therapy including 12 who received a second course of pembrolizumab [2]. Reported 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in the pembrolizumab arm was 31.9% versus 16.3% in the chemotherapy arm, despite 66% cross-over. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 5 years was 22.8% and 4.1%, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) in the patients treated with pembrolizumab was 46.1% (4.5% complete, 41.6% partial response) versus 31.1% (all partial response) in patients treated with chemotherapy. Median duration of response was 29.1 months and 6.3 months, respectively. In the pembrolizumab arm, 39 patients completed 2 years treatment with pembrolizumab. In these patients, 3-years OS rate from completion was 81% and ORR was 82% (10% complete, 72% partial response); 18/39 (46%) were alive without progression of disease at data cut-off.
Cemiplimab is a high-affinity anti-PD-1 antibody demonstrating anti-tumour activity in phase 1 and phase 2 trials with a safety profile similar to that described for other PD-1 inhibitors in several advanced solid tumours including NSCLC [3]. In the phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial, 710 treatment-naïve patients were randomised 1:1 to receive cemiplimab (350 mg every 3 weeks) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy. At data cut-off, 74% patients who progressed on chemotherapy had crossed-over from chemotherapy to cemiplimab. A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 50% of OS events [4]. In the ITT population, median OS was 22.1 months with cemiplimab (n=356) versus 14.3 months with chemotherapy (n=354; HR 0.68; P=0.002). 2-years OS rate was 48.6 and 29.7 months, respectively. In the PD-L1 ≥50% ITT population, median OS was not reached with cemiplimab (n=283) versus 14.2 months with chemotherapy (n=280; HR 0.57; P=0.0002; see Figure). Grade ≥3 adverse events were lower in patients treated with cemiplimab compared with chemotherapy (37.2% vs 48.5%).
Figure: Overall survival in the PD-L1 ≥50% ITT population of EMPOWER-Lung 1 [4]
- Reck M, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1823-1833.
- Brahmer J, et al. KEYNOTE-024 5-year OS update: First-line (1L) pembrolizumab (pembro) vs platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. ESMO 2020 Virtual Meeting, abstract LBA51.
- Papadopoulos KP, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:1025-1033.
- Sezer A, et al. EMPOWER-Lung 1: Phase III first-line (1L) cemiplimab monotherapy vs platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥50%. ESMO 2020 Virtual Meeting, abstract LBA52.
Posted on
Previous Article
« PD-L1 density, a new predictive biomarker in NSCLC Next Article
Lorlatinib outperforms crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC »
« PD-L1 density, a new predictive biomarker in NSCLC Next Article
Lorlatinib outperforms crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC »
Table of Contents: ESMO 2020
Featured articles
COVID-19 and Cancer
Breast Cancer
Gastrointestinal Cancers
Lung Cancer
Melanoma
Genitourinary Cancers
Bladder cancer risk and early detection
Gynaecological Cancers
Basic Science
Related Articles
November 25, 2020
Lorlatinib outperforms crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC
November 25, 2020
Surveillance after curative treatment for CRC
November 25, 2020
PD-L1 density, a new predictive biomarker in NSCLC
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com