Home > Oncology > ESMO 2022 > Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer > Addition of pembrolizumab to lenvatinib does not improve OS in advanced HCC

Addition of pembrolizumab to lenvatinib does not improve OS in advanced HCC

Presented by
Prof. Richard Finn, David Geffen School of Medicine, CA, USA
Conference
ESMO 2022
Trial
Phase 3, LEAP-002
Doi
https://doi.org/10.55788/71e2c0ab
The final analysis of the phase 3 LEAP-002 study did not demonstrate an overall survival (OS) benefit of the addition of pembrolizumab to first-line lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the study supports the potential usefulness of lenvatinib as a standard first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

Systemic therapy options for advanced stages of HCC have rapidly expanded in the past years. The REFLECT trial (NCT01761266) demonstrated lenvatinib in first-line to be non-inferior to sorafenib regarding OS [1]. In a phase 1 study, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated promising anti-tumour activity as first-line therapy in unresectable HCC [2]. The current global, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 LEAP-002 trial (NCT03713593), presented by Prof. Richard Finn (David Geffen School of Medicine, CA, USA) evaluated the efficacy of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib plus placebo as first-line therapy for advanced HCC [3].

The trial randomised 794 patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A, and without prior systemic treatment 1:1 to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or lenvatinib plus placebo. The dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Pre-specified efficacy boundaries were one-sided P=0.002 for PFS at the interim analysis (pre-specified final PFS analysis) and 0.0185 for OS at the final analysis.

Median OS in patients treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was 21.2 months (comparable to the phase 1 study) versus 19.0 months in patients with monotherapy lenvatinib (HR 0.840; P=0.0227). This difference was not statistically significant according to the pre-specified efficacy boundaries.

The median PFS at the time of the final analysis was 8.2 versus 8.1 months (HR 0.834). At 24 months, 16.7% of participants treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab were progression-free versus 9.3% of patients treated with lenvatinib plus placebo. The disease control rate was 81.3% in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm (26.1% objective response rate [ORR]) versus 78.4% (17.5% ORR) in the lenvatinib plus placebo arm. The duration of response was 16.6 and 10.4 months, respectively.

Overall, 44.1% of patients treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab received subsequent systemic anti-cancer treatment (34.9% tyrosine kinase inhibitor, 14.4% immunotherapy, 3.5% chemotherapy). Of all patients treated with lenvatinib plus placebo, 52.1% received subsequent systemic therapy (40.1% tyrosine kinase inhibitor, 22.8% immunotherapy, 3.3% chemotherapy).

Based on these results, Prof. Finn concluded that “this study does not meet its pre-specified statistical significance for OS and PFS. Nonetheless, median OS in the lenvatinib monotherapy arm was longer than what was observed in REFLECT (14.5 months), which supports its role as a standard first-line treatment for advanced HCC.”

  1. Kudo M, et al. Lancet 2018;391(10126):1163–1173.
  2. Finn RS, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(26):2960–2970.
  3. Finn RS, et al. Primary results from the phase III LEAP-002 study: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib as first-line (1L) therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Abstract LBA34, ESMO Congress 2022, 09–13 September, Paris, France.

Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on