The goal of surgery in advanced ovarian cancer is to prolong remission, improve OS, and maintain quality-of-life. Complete gross tumour resection is consistently associated with a favourable prognosis [1]. PCS followed by systemic therapy has been considered the standard-of-care for decades. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by ICS and then systemic therapy has emerged as an alternative strategy [2,3]. The optimal timing of surgery in resectable advanced ovarian cancer remains uncertain.
“The phase 3 TRUST study (NCT02828618) evaluated the optimal timing of maximal effort cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer,” explained Dr Sven Mahner (LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany) [4]. In total, 796 participants were randomised 1:1 to receive PCS or ICS. The primary endpoint was OS; key secondary endpoints included PFS, complete resection rate, and quality-of-life.
TRUST did not meet its primary endpoint: median OS was 54.3 months in the PCS arm versus 48.3 months in the ICS arm (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.74–1.08; P=0.24). However, PCS resulted in a statistically significant improvement in median PFS: 22.1 months versus 19.7 months in the ICS arm (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66–0.96; P=0.018). “The PFS benefit of PCS was most evident in participants with FIGO stage III disease and those who achieved complete gross resection,” said Dr Mahner.
Surgical morbidity was low in both groups, with complications reported in 18% and 12% of participants in the PCS and ICS arms, respectively. No significant differences in quality-of-life scores were observed at any timepoint.
“TRUST is the first randomised phase 3 trial to demonstrate a PFS benefit of primary over interval cytoreductive surgery, without compromising short- or long-term quality-of-life,” concluded Dr Mahner.
- Bristow RE, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:4065-4076.
- Fagotti A, et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30:1657-1664.
- Onda T, et al. Eur J Cancer. 2020;130:114-125.
- Mahner S, et al. TRUST: Trial of radical upfront surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. LBA5500, ASCO Annual Meeting 2025, 30 May–3 June, Chicago, IL, USA.
Medical writing support was provided by Dr Marten Dooper.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« No added benefit of relatlimab in the adjuvant melanoma setting Next Article
Anlotinib prolongs PFS in glioblastoma »
« No added benefit of relatlimab in the adjuvant melanoma setting Next Article
Anlotinib prolongs PFS in glioblastoma »
Table of Contents: ASCO 2025
Featured articles
Double the impact with less BCG: mitomycin combo maintains efficacy in NMIBC
BREAKWATER makes waves in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC treatment
Online First
A chemo-free second-line option for MET-amplified NSCLC
Nivolumab addition sets the first new post-operative standard for head-and-neck cancer in two decades
Anlotinib prolongs PFS in glioblastoma
Timing of cytoreductive surgery does not impact OS in ovarian cancer
No added benefit of relatlimab in the adjuvant melanoma setting
Benmelstobart-anlotinib combination superior to pembrolizumab in advanced NSCLC
Rusfertide improves symptoms and quality-of-life in polycythaemia vera
Anlotinib non-inferior to bevacizumab in first-line treatment of mCRC
ATOMIC trial establishes new standard for adjuvant treatment in dMMR stage 3 colon cancer
Double the impact with less BCG: mitomycin combo maintains efficacy in NMIBC
TTFields therapy shows survival benefit in unresectable pancreatic cancer
Sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab outperforms chemotherapy in PD-L1+ metastatic TNBC
Vepdegestrant outperforms fulvestrant in ESR1-mutant aBC
DESTINY delivered: Trastuzumab deruxtecan extends survival in HER2-positive gastric cancer
BREAKWATER makes waves in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC treatment
Related Articles
August 21, 2024
Sequence effect for third-line treatment of mCRC
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com