https://doi.org/10.55788/29c7be3e
For patients with locally advanced colon cancer, the standard-of-care is upfront surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy is added to reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with risk factors. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a widely accepted approach in numerous cancers. Potential benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are the elimination of micrometastases, reduction of tumour size, prehabilitation before surgery, and reduction of adjuvant chemotherapy.
The aim of the randomised, phase 3 NeoCol trial (NCT01918527) was to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer compared with standard upfront surgery. The primary endpoint was DFS. Dr Lars Hendrik Jensen (University of Southern Denmark, Denmark) presented the preliminary results [1].
The study enrolled 250 patients with T3 (with invasive depth >5 mm) or T4 colon cancer. The participants were randomised 1:1 to upfront surgery (Arm A) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (3 cycles CAPOX) followed by surgery (Arm B). Adjuvant chemotherapy in both arms was chosen based on the pathological stage of the cancer (minus any neoadjuvant cycles).
The primary endpoint of the study was not met: both DFS and overall survival were similar in both arms. The total number of chemotherapy cycles was trend-wise lower in Arm B compared with Arm A: 4.8 versus 5.9 (P=0.06). In Arm B, 59% of patients fulfilled the criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 73% in Arm A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in downstaging of the tumour: 10% T2 or lower in Arm B compared with 4% in Arm A; and 59% N0 in Arm B compared with 48% in Arm A. Surgical complications were lower in Arm B, such as ileus (3% vs 8%) and anastomotic leakage (2% vs 8%). Fewer patients in Arm B had neuropathy compared with Arm A.
“Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not superior to standard upfront surgery in locally advanced colon cancer concerning survival. However, the neoadjuvant approach may have favourable outcomes in the number of chemotherapy cycles, risk of chemotherapy toxicity, some surgical complications, and in downsizing and downstaging. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be offered as a viable treatment option,” concluded Dr Jensen. However, many questions remain and further analysis of the data are ongoing.
- Jensen LH, et al. Phase III randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and standard treatment in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. Abstract LBA3503, ASCO Annual Meeting 2023, 2–6 June, Chicago, USA.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Medicom Medical Publishers.
User license: Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Posted on
Previous Article
« De-escalation of neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is non-inferior Next Article
7-year outcomes of PRODIGE 23 trial »
« De-escalation of neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is non-inferior Next Article
7-year outcomes of PRODIGE 23 trial »
Table of Contents: ASCO 2023
Featured articles
What can real-world evidence teach us about atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in HCC?
Colorectal Cancer
7-year outcomes of PRODIGE 23 trial
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be viable option in locally advanced colon cancer
De-escalation of neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is non-inferior
Breast Cancer
SONIA: No survival benefit with first-line versus second-line CDK4/6 inhibition in metastatic breast cancer
Adjuvant ribociclib improves invasive DFS in early breast cancer
Gene expression profiles predict benefit of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint therapy in triple-negative breast cancer
Lung Cancer
Adding pembrolizumab to perioperative chemotherapy improves EFS in early-stage NSCLC
TTFields therapy: a new treatment modality for metastatic NSCLC
Adding chemotherapy to EGFR TKI does not improve OS in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC
Upper GI Cancer
No improved OS in pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX
AI detects gastric cancer with high accuracy in common blood tests
Melanoma
Response-directed treatment personalisation in stage III melanoma
Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma
GU Cancers
Combining PARP inhibition and androgen receptor-signalling inhibition improves radiographic progression-free survival in HRR-deficient mCRPC
Erdafitinib outperforms chemotherapy in FGFR-altered advanced urothelial cancer
Probiotic CBM588 seems to improve clinical effect cabozantinib/nivolumab in mRCC
Exploratory analysis of IMvigor130 trial finds no OS benefit from atezolizumab in subgroups
Miscellaneous
Immune checkpoint inhibition improves PFS in non-BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer
First-line nivolumab-AVD improves PFS both in adult and paediatric patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma
Vorasidenib successfully targets IDH1/2-mutated glioma
ASCO Interviews
IMbrave050: Adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab provides landmark recurrence-free survival for HCC
What can real-world evidence teach us about atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in HCC?
Related Articles


August 5, 2022
Practice-changing results of T-DXd in HER2-low breast cancer
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy