Since anti-CGRP mAbs are indicated for the prevention of chronic migraine, there is a need for data on their long-term tolerability and safety. However, real-world data are very limited, said Dr Edoardo Caronna (Vall d’Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain). He presented 2-year results from EUREkA, a European multicentre, prospective, real-world study of adult migraine with participants from 35 centres in 7 European countries [1]. The study cohort includes adult patients with high-frequency episodic (EM) or chronic (CM) migraine treated with anti-CGRP mAbs. Results of the first 6 months were published in 2024 [2]. For the present study, Dr Caronna and colleagues compared participants who completed 24 months of treatment (ON group) with those who discontinued treatment due to lack of effectiveness (OFF group).
The ON group consisted of 1340 participants. Median age was 48 years, and 82% were female. The median monthly headache days decreased from 20 to 10 (p<0.001); the median monthly migraine days from 15 to 5 (p<0.001); and the number of acute medication days from 15 to 6 (p<0.001). In all, 60.4% had a ≥50% response. At baseline, 70% had CM; of this group, 20.3% had converted to EM at month 24.
The OFF group counted 1057 participants. Compared to the ON group, the OFF group had significantly higher proportions of CM (ON: 69.9% vs OFF: 82.9%), depression (ON: 24.0% vs OFF: 38.0%), anxiety (ON: 30.7% vs OFF: 41.0%) and obesity (ON: 7.2% vs OFF: 19.1%) (p<0.001).
Dr Caronna concluded that a sustained response over time may help more precisely characterise CGRP-dependent individuals for future studies. He also noted that obesity is a predictor of therapy discontinuation, highlighting the need to better understand how body weight affects migraine and the pharmacokinetics of anti-CGRP mAbs.
- Caronna E, et al. European multicenter study on the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: The 2-year follow-up. OPR-008, EAN Congress 2025, 21-24 June 2025, Helsinki, Finland.
- Caronna E, et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024;95(10):927-37.
Medical writing support was provided by Michiel Tent.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Occipital nerve stimulation is no more effective than placebo in cluster headache Next Article
EULAR 2025 Highlights Podcast »
« Occipital nerve stimulation is no more effective than placebo in cluster headache Next Article
EULAR 2025 Highlights Podcast »
Table of Contents: EAN 2025
Featured articles
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough
Online First
Similar efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs in short- and long-term migraine prevention
Occipital nerve stimulation is no more effective than placebo in cluster headache
Rituximab does not halt progression in non-active secondary progressive MS
Encouraging results for adaptive DBS for Parkinson’s disease
CAR T cell therapy shows promise in severe autoimmune neuropathies
GLP-1R agonists reduce migraine burden in obese patients
Is ChatGPT helpful in diagnosing polyneuropathies?
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Dementia doubles mortality risk 1 year after hip fracture
Real-world data confirms effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in MS
Virus-specific T cells show promise in treating PML
Comparable effectiveness and persistence of ocrelizumab, natalizumab
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough
Long-term benefits of cipa/mig in late-onset Pompe disease
Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes
Related Articles
December 7, 2020
Later school start time linked to fewer migraines in adolescents
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com