naSPMS is characterised by a steady increase in disability without relapses or MRI activity. “There is no approved disease-modifying therapy for naSPMS,” said Nadine Ehrhardt (University of Augsburg, Germany). Rituximab is sometimes prescribed off-label. Studies addressing the efficacy of this B-cell-depleting therapy in naSPMS are lacking. Therefore, Ehrhardt and colleagues conducted a retrospective multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in participants with naSPMS [1].
They included 46 naSPMS participants who received rituximab for at least 6 months. The total observational period was up to 5 years, starting 24 months before rituximab treatment, and including up to 36 months after the start of treatment. Baseline characteristics, disability progression before and during treatment, MRI activity and safety were analysed.
The 46 participants had a mean age of 49.5 years at the start of treatment and were predominantly male (59%). Mean age at MS manifestation was 29.5 years; mean time since naSPMS onset was 4.72 years. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at the start of rituximab treatment was 5.45. There was a significant increase in EDSS to 6 (IQR 4.38-6.5; p=0.046; n=34) after 18 months, and also after 36 months (IQR 4.5-6.5; p=0.029; n=24) compared to baseline. Maximum walking distance was significantly reduced (by 24 meters) already 24 months before rituximab treatment (p=0.018), and remained reduced 36 months after the start of treatment (p=0.233). Patients with MRI activity within 6 months before treatment start were excluded from the study to meet the naSPMS definition. 6 participants showed MRI disease activity between 6 and 30 months from treatment start, 3 between 18 and 6 months prior to treatment start.
The most common side-effects were infusion-related reactions (15%), urinary tract infections (11%) and respiratory tract infections (6.5%). There was 1 malignancy. Of the participants who withdrew from treatment, 33% did so because of inefficacy and 22% due to comorbidities, the other because of AEs, patient decision or other causes.
- Ehrhardt N, et al. Effect of rituximab on non-active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis – a retrospective multicenter analysis. OPR-080, EAN Congress 2025, 21-24 June, Helsinki, Finland.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Real-world data confirms the effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in MS Next Article
Long-term benefits of cipa/mig in late-onset Pompe disease »
« Real-world data confirms the effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in MS Next Article
Long-term benefits of cipa/mig in late-onset Pompe disease »
Table of Contents: EAN 2025
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Multiple Sclerosis
Rituximab does not halt progression in non-active secondary progressive MS
Real-world data confirms the effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in MS
Comparable effectiveness and persistence of ocrelizumab and natalizumab
Muscle/Neuromuscular Disorders
Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes
Long-term benefits of cipa/mig in late-onset Pompe disease
Neuropathies
Is ChatGPT helpful in diagnosing polyneuropathies?
Riliprubart could be a new treatment option for CIDP
CAR T cell therapy shows promise in severe autoimmune neuropathies
Epilepsy
SUDEP is an underreported cause of death in epilepsy patients
Stroke
Significant impact of implementing thrombectomy in Spanish stroke centres
Sleep
OX2R agonists are a promising causal treatment of narcolepsy
Neurologists must wake up to the importance of sleep
Infectious Diseases
Virus-specific T cells show promise in treating PML
Parkinson's disease
Encouraging results of adaptive DBS for Parkinson’s disease
Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Dementia doubles the mortality risk 1 year after hip fracture
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Headache and Migrane
GLP-1R agonists reduce migraine burden in obese patients
Occipital nerve stimulation is no more effective than placebo in cluster headache
Similar efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs in short- and long-term migraine prevention
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough
Related Articles
December 20, 2022
Re-myelination strategies in MS still pose many unanswered questions
October 15, 2025
ECTRIMS 2025 Highlights Podcast
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
