ONS elicits neuromodulatory effects and has shown promise in preventing attacks in CCH, said Dr. Ida Stisen Fogh-Andersen (Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark). However, evidence is limited and largely derived from open-label studies. Conventional (tonic) ONS induces paresthesia that the participants can feel, thus making blinding difficult and limiting the reliability of prior comparisons.
A new approach, paresthesia-free burst stimulation, enables double-blind testing because the participant does not feel the stimulation. Dr Fogh-Andersen and colleagues therefore conducted a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial of burst ONS in participants with CCH. It comprised a 4-week baseline, a 12-week trial with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). The results of which were previously published [2]; ONS implantation followed by a 2-week grace period, a 12-week randomised, double-blind burst ONS treatment period, and finally a 12-week open-label tonic ONS treatment period. The primary outcome was a ≥30% reduction in attack frequency during the randomised phase.
Dr Fogh-Andersen said all 38 participants had >15 headache attacks per month. They underwent ONS implantation and were randomly assigned to burst ONS (n=19) or placebo (n=19). The primary endpoint was met by 18.81% (95% CI: 0.28%-37.87%) in the burst ONS group and 50.02% (95% CI: 26.87%-73.09%) in the placebo group. The placebo group had a 31.20% higher chance of reaching the primary endpoint (95% CI: 1.29%-61.23%; p=0.042). After the open-label phase, a ≥30% attack reduction was observed in 42.09% (95% CI: 19.91%-64.34%) and 51.11% (95% CI: 27.32%-74.88%), respectively.
Dr Fogh-Anderson concluded: “Both burst and tonic ONS reduced attack frequency in participants with severe CCH, but neither approach proved superior to placebo. These findings highlight the need for rigorous, randomised, placebo-controlled trials in the further development of ONS therapies.”
- Fogh-Andersen I, et al. Occipital nerve stimulation for chronic cluster headache: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. OPR-074, EAN Congress 2025, 21-24 June 2025, Helsinki, Finland.
- Fogh-Andersen IS, et al. Headache. 2025;65(6):973-82.
Medical writing support was provided by Michiel Tent.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Rituximab does not halt progression in non-active secondary progressive MS Next Article
Similar efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs in short- and long-term migraine prevention »
« Rituximab does not halt progression in non-active secondary progressive MS Next Article
Similar efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs in short- and long-term migraine prevention »
Table of Contents: EAN 2025
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Multiple Sclerosis
Rituximab does not halt progression in non-active secondary progressive MS
Real-world data confirms the effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in MS
Comparable effectiveness and persistence of ocrelizumab and natalizumab
Muscle/Neuromuscular Disorders
Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes
Long-term benefits of cipa/mig in late-onset Pompe disease
Neuropathies
Is ChatGPT helpful in diagnosing polyneuropathies?
Riliprubart could be a new treatment option for CIDP
CAR T cell therapy shows promise in severe autoimmune neuropathies
Epilepsy
SUDEP is an underreported cause of death in epilepsy patients
Stroke
Significant impact of implementing thrombectomy in Spanish stroke centres
Sleep
OX2R agonists are a promising causal treatment of narcolepsy
Neurologists must wake up to the importance of sleep
Infectious Diseases
Virus-specific T cells show promise in treating PML
Parkinson's disease
Encouraging results of adaptive DBS for Parkinson’s disease
Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Dementia doubles the mortality risk 1 year after hip fracture
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Headache and Migrane
GLP-1R agonists reduce migraine burden in obese patients
Occipital nerve stimulation is no more effective than placebo in cluster headache
Similar efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs in short- and long-term migraine prevention
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough
Related Articles
November 18, 2024
Gut microbiota modulate inflammation and cortical damage
June 16, 2021
Vutrisiran for hATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy
August 22, 2022
Updated EAN-ECTRIMS guideline on pharmacological MS treatment
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
