The phase 3 double-blind PROPEL study (NCT03729362) compared cipa/mig with alg/pbo in adults with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Prof. Antonio Toscano (University of Messina, Italy) said that the differences in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) after 52 weeks did not reach statistical significance [1,2]. However, there were potentially clinically meaningful improvements in motor and respiratory function, as well as biomarkers, which prompted an open-label extension (OLE) trial (NCT04138277). Outcomes included 6MWD, forced vital capacity (FVC), creatine kinase (CK) and hexose tetrasaccharide (Hex4) levels, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Prof. Toscano reported results after up to 52 weeks on efficacy and safety of cipa/mig [1,3].
Of the 119 participants in the OLE, 82 continued with cipa/mig and 37 switched from alg/pbo to cipa/mig. Of these, 62 and 29 had had enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) before, respectively. Mean change from PROPEL baseline in % predicted 6MWD to week 104 was +3.1 for continuous cipa/mig users and -0.5 for the participants who switched, in the ERT-experienced group, and +8.6 for continuous cipa/mig users and +8.9 for the participants who switched, in the ERT-naïve group. Corresponding numbers for mean change in % predicted FVC were -0.6 and -3.8 in the ERT-experienced group, and -4.8 and -3.1 in ERT-naïve participants. Cipa/mig was associated with a durable reduction in serum CK and urine Hex4 levels by week 104. There were no new safety signals.
Prof. Toscano added that ERT-experienced participants who received cipa/mig in PROPEL showed improvements in patient-reported physical function and fatigue, which remained stable until week 104 [4]. In the alg/pbo group, these scores remained stable until week 52 and deteriorated between weeks 52–104.
- Toscano A. Cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat in adults with late-onset Pompe disease: A phase III open-label extension study. SPS05_2, EAN Congress 2025, 21-24 June 2025, Helsinki, Finland.
- Schoser B, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(12):1027-37.
- Schoser B, et al. J Neurol. 2024;271(5):2810-23.
- Kishnani PS, et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024;8(1):132.
Medical writing support was provided by Michiel Tent.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes Next Article
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough »
« Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes Next Article
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough »
Table of Contents: EAN 2025
Featured articles
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough
Online First
Similar efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs in short- and long-term migraine prevention
Occipital nerve stimulation is no more effective than placebo in cluster headache
Rituximab does not halt progression in non-active secondary progressive MS
Encouraging results for adaptive DBS for Parkinson’s disease
CAR T cell therapy shows promise in severe autoimmune neuropathies
GLP-1R agonists reduce migraine burden in obese patients
Is ChatGPT helpful in diagnosing polyneuropathies?
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Dementia doubles mortality risk 1 year after hip fracture
Real-world data confirms effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in MS
Virus-specific T cells show promise in treating PML
Comparable effectiveness and persistence of ocrelizumab, natalizumab
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough
Long-term benefits of cipa/mig in late-onset Pompe disease
Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes
Related Articles
October 16, 2020
Telemedicine could help rural patients with dementia
November 8, 2019
Novel ways to assess MS
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com