The phase 3 double-blind PROPEL study (NCT03729362) compared cipa/mig with alg/pbo in adults with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Prof. Antonio Toscano (University of Messina, Italy) said that the differences in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) after 52 weeks did not reach statistical significance [1,2]. However, there were potentially clinically meaningful improvements in motor and respiratory function, as well as biomarkers, which prompted an open-label extension (OLE) trial (NCT04138277). Outcomes included 6MWD, forced vital capacity (FVC), creatine kinase (CK) and hexose tetrasaccharide (Hex4) levels, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Prof. Toscano reported results after up to 52 weeks on efficacy and safety of cipa/mig [1,3].
Of the 119 participants in the OLE, 82 continued with cipa/mig and 37 switched from alg/pbo to cipa/mig. Of these, 62 and 29 had had enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) before, respectively. Mean change from PROPEL baseline in % predicted 6MWD to week 104 was +3.1 for continuous cipa/mig users and -0.5 for the participants who switched, in the ERT-experienced group, and +8.6 for continuous cipa/mig users and +8.9 for the participants who switched, in the ERT-naĂŻve group. Corresponding numbers for mean change in % predicted FVC were -0.6 and -3.8 in the ERT-experienced group, and -4.8 and -3.1 in ERT-naĂŻve participants. Cipa/mig was associated with a durable reduction in serum CK and urine Hex4 levels by week 104. There were no new safety signals.
Prof. Toscano added that ERT-experienced participants who received cipa/mig in PROPEL showed improvements in patient-reported physical function and fatigue, which remained stable until week 104 [4]. In the alg/pbo group, these scores remained stable until week 52 and deteriorated between weeks 52–104.
- Toscano A. Cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat in adults with late-onset Pompe disease: A phase III open-label extension study. SPS05_2, EAN Congress 2025, 21-24 June 2025, Helsinki, Finland.
- Schoser B, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(12):1027-37.
- Schoser B, et al. J Neurol. 2024;271(5):2810-23.
- Kishnani PS, et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024;8(1):132.
Medical writing support was provided by Michiel Tent.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes Next Article
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough »
« Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes Next Article
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough »
Table of Contents: EAN 2025
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Multiple Sclerosis
Rituximab does not halt progression in non-active secondary progressive MS
Real-world data confirms the effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in MS
Comparable effectiveness and persistence of ocrelizumab and natalizumab
Muscle/Neuromuscular Disorders
Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes
Long-term benefits of cipa/mig in late-onset Pompe disease
Neuropathies
Is ChatGPT helpful in diagnosing polyneuropathies?
Riliprubart could be a new treatment option for CIDP
CAR T cell therapy shows promise in severe autoimmune neuropathies
Epilepsy
SUDEP is an underreported cause of death in epilepsy patients
Stroke
Significant impact of implementing thrombectomy in Spanish stroke centres
Sleep
OX2R agonists are a promising causal treatment of narcolepsy
Neurologists must wake up to the importance of sleep
Infectious Diseases
Virus-specific T cells show promise in treating PML
Parkinson's disease
Encouraging results of adaptive DBS for Parkinson’s disease
Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Dementia doubles the mortality risk 1 year after hip fracture
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Headache and Migrane
GLP-1R agonists reduce migraine burden in obese patients
Occipital nerve stimulation is no more effective than placebo in cluster headache
Similar efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs in short- and long-term migraine prevention
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough
Related Articles
September 8, 2020
Non-Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology in the elderly
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
