Ocrelizumab and natalizumab are both high-efficacy monoclonal antibodies widely used in clinical practice. Dr Elena Barbuti (Sapienza University of Rome, Italy) set up a study which analysed data from patients with MS who started either therapy between 2010 and 2019, followed up in the university hospitals of Rome or Napoli, and had either relapsing or progressive MS.
The study population consisted of 308 patients, including 140 who used ocrelizumab and 168 who used natalizumab. In this original cohort, patients in the ocrelizumab group were older (mean age 49.9 vs 42 years; P<0.001), less often active (42.1% vs 87.5%; P<0.001), and less frequently treatment-naĂŻve (22.9% vs 33.9%; P=0.03). Propensity score matching resulted in a cohort of 140 patients, comprising 70 pairs of patients, with one patient in each pair treated with ocrelizumab and the other with natalizumab. The mean follow-up in this cohort was 55.9 months. Dr Barbuti said that no significant differences were found between natalizumab and ocrelizumab in the following outcomes:
- No Evidence of Disease Activity 3 (NEDA-3): HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.34–1.24; P=0.19).
- Number of relapses: HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.11–1.57; P=0.19).
- MRI activity: HR 0.37 (95% CI 0.10–1.44; P=0.15).
- Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression: HR 1.43 (95% CI 0.60–3.40; P=0.42).
Of note, ocrelizumab was associated with a higher risk of adverse events (AEs): OR 4.50 (95% CI 1.53–16.50; P=0.01). Of the 140 patients, 19 developed one or more AEs; 15 of these patients were on ocrelizumab. However, most AEs were blood test abnormalities, and none were life-threatening. Treatment discontinuation rates were comparable for both drugs.
- Barbuti E, et al. Ocrelizumab versus natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: a propensity-score study. OPR-037, EAN Congress 2025, 21-24 June 2025, Helsinki, Finland.
Medical writing support was provided by Michiel Tent.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough Next Article
Virus-specific T cells show promise in treating PML »
« Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough Next Article
Virus-specific T cells show promise in treating PML »
Table of Contents: EAN 2025
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Parkinson's disease
Encouraging results of adaptive DBS for Parkinson’s disease
Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Dementia doubles the mortality risk 1 year after hip fracture
Lecanemab in AD: not a paradigm shift, but a small step forward
Headache and Migrane
GLP-1R agonists reduce migraine burden in obese patients
Occipital nerve stimulation is no more effective than placebo in cluster headache
Similar efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs in short- and long-term migraine prevention
Why a good result of migraine treatment may not be good enough
Multiple Sclerosis
Rituximab does not halt progression in non-active secondary progressive MS
Real-world data confirms the effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in MS
Comparable effectiveness and persistence of ocrelizumab and natalizumab
Muscle/Neuromuscular Disorders
Earlier add-on treatment in myasthenia gravis improves outcomes
Long-term benefits of cipa/mig in late-onset Pompe disease
Neuropathies
Is ChatGPT helpful in diagnosing polyneuropathies?
Riliprubart could be a new treatment option for CIDP
CAR T cell therapy shows promise in severe autoimmune neuropathies
Epilepsy
SUDEP is an underreported cause of death in epilepsy patients
Stroke
Significant impact of implementing thrombectomy in Spanish stroke centres
Sleep
OX2R agonists are a promising causal treatment of narcolepsy
Neurologists must wake up to the importance of sleep
Infectious Diseases
Virus-specific T cells show promise in treating PML
Related Articles
November 25, 2020
Serum NfL as biomarker for suboptimal treatment response
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
