Home > Neurology > EAN 2021 > Epilepsy > Good safety and efficacy of cenobamate for focal seizures

Good safety and efficacy of cenobamate for focal seizures

Conference
EAN 2021
Trial
C013, C017, C021
Onset of cenobamate efficacy in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures occurred early, occurred at lower doses than the target dose for maintenance therapy, and continued to improve at higher doses [1]. Adverse events (AEs) occurred primarily during titration, were generally self-limited in duration, and mainly mild or moderate in severity [2]. Slower titration reduced their severity.

In Europe, cenobamate is approved for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalisation, in adult patients who have not been adequately controlled despite a history of treatment with at least 2 anti-epileptic drugs. In C013 (NCT01397968) [3] and C017 (NCT01866111) [4], 2 international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with open-label extensions (OLE), efficacy and safety were assessed. A pooled post-hoc analysis established time to onset of efficacy during titration [1].

In C013, participants were randomised to placebo (n=108) or cenobamate 200 mg/day (n=113). Cenobamate was titrated by 50 mg/day every 2 weeks until the maintenance dose of 200 mg/day was reached. Patients in the cenobamate group had significant reductions in median percentage seizure frequency of -26.7% versus -15.1% in the placebo group (P<0.05), starting as early as in the first 1–2 weeks of titration at 50 mg/day.

In C017, participants were randomised to placebo (n=106), cenobamate 100 mg/day (n=108), 200 mg/day (n=109), or 400 mg/day (n=111). The initial starting dose of 100 mg/day was reduced to 50 mg/day, after which the titration rate to target dose was slowed to improve tolerability. As in C013, participants had significant reductions in median percentage seizure frequency (-36.4%) versus placebo (-20.0%; P<0.05), starting in the first week of titration at 50 mg/day.

In both studies, sustained significant decreases in seizure frequency with cenobamate versus placebo were seen throughout the 6-week titration period. The median reduction in seizure frequency was progressively higher with increasing cenobamate doses of 100, 200, and 400 mg/day.

In a second pooled ad-hoc analysis, time to onset, duration, and severity of the most common AEs were assessed in 3 studies: C013, C017, and the large international open-label safety study C021 (NCT02535091) [2,5]. In C021 (n=1,339) cenobamate titration started at a lower dose, which was also up-titrated slower than in C013/C017 (“start low, go slow”). Patients initiated cenobamate at 12.5 mg/day for 2 weeks, followed by 25 mg/day for 2 weeks and 50 mg/day for 2 weeks; the dose was then increased by 50 mg/day at 2-week intervals to the target dose of 200 mg/day. Maximum dose was 400 mg/day. The analysis focused on the most common AEs: somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.

AEs emerged throughout the double-blind period and OLE, mostly during titration. In C021, AEs peaked when dose reached 50 mg/day. Median duration in days during the double-blind period shows AEs were generally self-limited in duration:

  • somnolence: cenobamate 32%, placebo 22%;
  • dizziness: cenobamate 11%, placebo 8%;
  • fatigue: cenobamate 34%, placebo 20.5%.

AEs in the double-blind period of C013 and C017 were primarily mild or moderate, with few severe AEs. In C021, AEs were more often mild and fewer were moderate and severe (see Figure). The authors concluded that slower titration, using the currently recommended schedule, reduced severity of the most common AEs.

Figure: Severity of most common adverse events in C013, C017, and C021 [5]


  1. Steinhoff BJ, et al. Cenobamate as adjunctive therapy in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures: time to onset of efficacy during titration. EPR-307, EAN 2021 Virtual Congress, 19–22 June.
  2. Steinhoff BJ, et al. Safety of adjunctive cenobamate in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures: time to onset, duration, and severity of Aes. OPR-153, EAN 2021 Virtual Congress, 19–22 June.
  3. Chung SS, et al. Neurology. 2020;94(22):e2311-22.
  4. Krauss GL, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(1):38-48.
  5. Sperling MR, et al. Epilepsia. 2020;61(6):1099-108.

 

Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on