The phase 3 STARGLO trial randomised 274 ASCT-ineligible patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL 2:1 to Glofit-GemOx or R-GemOx [1,2]. Participants in the experimental arm received 8 21-day cycles of Glofit-GemOx and 3 cycles of glofitamab monotherapy. The primary analysis demonstrated that the glofitamab-containing regimen outperformed the rituximab-containing regimen for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and other clinical outcomes [1]. In the current analysis, Dr Gareth Gregory (Monash University, Australia) shared the findings after 2 years of follow-up [2].
The 24-month OS rates were 54.4% for participants on glofitamab and 33.6% for participants on rituximab (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.42–0.85; P=0.003), showing a clinically meaningful OS benefit for Glofit-GemOx over R-GemOx. In addition, the median PFS was 13.8 months in the Glofit-GemOx arm and 3.6 months in the R-GemOx arm (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.29–0.58; P<0.001). “Over 80% of the participants in the glofitamab arm with a complete response at end-of-treatment [n=82] was alive and did not have disease progression 12 months after the therapy was concluded,” said Dr Gregory. Next to this, he mentioned that immune recovery was observed at 18–24 months after fixed-duration treatment with Glofit-GemOx. “Finally, the safety profiles of the treatment regimens remained manageable and consistent with the known safety profiles of the respective study drugs,” stated Dr Gregory.
“These updated results support the use of Glofit-GemOx as a fixed-duration, off-the-shelf therapy for ASCT-ineligible patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL,” concluded Dr Gregory.
- Abramson JS, et al. Lancet. 2024;404:1940-1954.
- Gregory GP, et al. Glofitamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Glofit-GemOx) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): 2-year follow-up of STARGLO. PS1909, EHA2025 Congress, 12–15 June, Milan, Italy.
Medical writing support was provided by Robert van den Heuvel.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Lumasiran shows continued promise in infants and young children with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 Next Article
MANIFEST-2: Sustained benefits of pelabresib plus ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis »
« Lumasiran shows continued promise in infants and young children with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 Next Article
MANIFEST-2: Sustained benefits of pelabresib plus ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis »
Table of Contents: EHA 2025
Featured articles
Prognostic impact of circulating tumour cells in AL amyloidosis
Online First
Unravelling real-world safety and effectiveness of axi-cel in LBCL
Prognostic impact of circulating tumour cells in AL amyloidosis
Novel investigational gene-editing therapy for TDT and SCD
inMIND: Positive phase 3 results for tafasitamab combination in FL
ELM-2: Survival benefit for patients with FL on odronextamab
HCT Frailty Scale may refine allo-HCT selection process
Promising safety and efficacy data for novel anti-CD38 treatment in ITP
Encouraging results for new mutation-specific targeted therapy in CALR-mutated ET
RedirecTT-1: Dual antigen-targeting treatment associated with promising efficacy in EMD myeloma
Large pooled analysis reveals prognostic utility of circulating tumour cells in MM
GAIA/CLL13: Positive 5-year efficacy outcomes for GIV in CLL
Targeted anti-thymocyte globulin dosing improves transplantation outcomes
TUSCANY: Promising data for addition of tuspetinib in untreated chemo-ineligible AML
MANIFEST-2: Sustained benefits of pelabresib plus ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis
STARGLO: Long-term clinical benefits of Glofit-GemOx over R-GemOx in DLBCL
Related Articles
September 9, 2020
Zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com