“Since there is no consensus on how to stratify patients with MM based on CTCs, we performed an analysis among 2,466 patients with newly diagnosed MM to investigate this matter,” said Dr Luca Bertamini (University of Turin, Italy) [1]. The study comprised a diverse population: 45% of the patients were 65 years or older, 48% were ineligible for transplant, and 59% participated in clinical trials.
After a median follow-up of 56.8 months, the median CTC level was 0.017%, with no observed differences between the datasets from the 6 participating European countries. Dr Bertamini highlighted that continuous CTC levels were prognostic of PFS outcomes. “We were able to discriminate between 5 groups of patients with different CTC levels in terms of PFS,” he said. “Patients with high CTC levels had a significantly shorter PFS duration than those with low CTC levels [P<0.0001]. Moreover, CTC level was an independent predictor for PFS [HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.12-1.24; P<0.001].” The research team determined the optimal CTC cut-off level for clinical use at 0.02%. “Patients with CTC levels of 0.02% or lower clearly outperformed patients with CTC levels above 0.02% in terms of PFS,” clarified Dr Bertamini. CTC levels were prognostic for PFS across clinical trial and real-world subgroups, as well as for transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients.
Thus, CTC may serve as an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with MM, finetuning the risk assessment for the population, concluded Dr Bertamini. Incorporating CTC levels into standard risk stratification may improve the prognostic ability of these classification tools.
- Bertamini L, et al. Circulating tumour cells for the staging of multiple myeloma: a European pooled analysis of 2,446 newly diagnosed patients. S199, EHA2025 Congress, 12–15 June, Milan, Italy.
Medical writing support was provided by Robert van den Heuvel.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« GAIA/CLL13: Positive 5-year efficacy outcomes for GIV in CLL Next Article
RedirecTT-1: Dual antigen-targeting treatment associated with promising efficacy in EMD myeloma »
« GAIA/CLL13: Positive 5-year efficacy outcomes for GIV in CLL Next Article
RedirecTT-1: Dual antigen-targeting treatment associated with promising efficacy in EMD myeloma »
Table of Contents: EHA 2025
Featured articles
Prognostic impact of circulating tumour cells in AL amyloidosis
Online First
Unravelling real-world safety and effectiveness of axi-cel in LBCL
Prognostic impact of circulating tumour cells in AL amyloidosis
Novel investigational gene-editing therapy for TDT and SCD
inMIND: Positive phase 3 results for tafasitamab combination in FL
ELM-2: Survival benefit for patients with FL on odronextamab
HCT Frailty Scale may refine allo-HCT selection process
Promising safety and efficacy data for novel anti-CD38 treatment in ITP
Encouraging results for new mutation-specific targeted therapy in CALR-mutated ET
RedirecTT-1: Dual antigen-targeting treatment associated with promising efficacy in EMD myeloma
Large pooled analysis reveals prognostic utility of circulating tumour cells in MM
GAIA/CLL13: Positive 5-year efficacy outcomes for GIV in CLL
Targeted anti-thymocyte globulin dosing improves transplantation outcomes
TUSCANY: Promising data for addition of tuspetinib in untreated chemo-ineligible AML
MANIFEST-2: Sustained benefits of pelabresib plus ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis
STARGLO: Long-term clinical benefits of Glofit-GemOx over R-GemOx in DLBCL
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com