https://doi.org/10.55788/ea89fda0
“ATRA plus ATO is the first-line standard of care for patients with low- or intermediate-risk APL [1],” said Prof. Uwe Platzbecker (Leipzig University Hospital, Germany) [1,2]. “However, in high-risk APL, ATRA plus chemotherapy is still the standard of care and ATRA plus ATO has not yet been assessed” [1]. The phase 3 TUD-APOLLO-064 study (NCT02688140) included 133 participants with newly diagnosed high-risk APL, who were randomised 1:1 to the ATRA plus ATO or the ATRA plus chemotherapy arm. The primary endpoint was event-free survival at 2 years follow-up.
The incidence of relapse at 2 years was significantly higher in the chemotherapy arm than in the ATO arm (14.0% vs 1.6%; P=0.011). In line with that, the 2-year event-free survival rate was higher in the ATO arm than in the chemotherapy arm (88% vs 70%; P=0.02). The overall survival data was not yet mature at 2 years of follow-up but suggested an advantage for participants randomised to ATO (93% vs 87%).
“Haematologic toxicities were more prevalent in the chemotherapy arm than the ATO arm, particularly during the consolidation phase,” evaluated Prof. Platzbecker. Thrombocytopenia and grade 3 or 4 neutropaenia were almost non-existent in the ATO group during consolidation but were seen in up to 56% of the participants on chemotherapy. The occurrence of non-haematologic toxicities did not differ substantially between the 2 study arms.
ATRA plus ATO outperformed ATRA plus chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated high-risk APL in terms of event-free survival. Further analysis is awaited and will reveal whether ATRA plus ATO should be the new standard of care for this high-risk APL population.
- Platzbecker U, et al. A randomized phase III study to compare arsenic trioxide (ATO) combined to ATRA and idarabucin versus standard ATRA and anthracycline-based chemotherapy (AIDA regimen) for patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia. S102, EHA congress 2024, 13–16 June, Madrid, Spain.
- Lo-Coco F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:111–121.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Excellent phase 3 results for asciminib in chronic myeloid leukaemia Next Article
PhALLCON: Third-generation TKI superior to first-generation TKI in Ph+ ALL »
« Excellent phase 3 results for asciminib in chronic myeloid leukaemia Next Article
PhALLCON: Third-generation TKI superior to first-generation TKI in Ph+ ALL »
Table of Contents: EHA 2024
Featured articles
Meet the Expert: Prof. C. Ola Landgren discusses MRD as a key endpoint in haematological cancer trials
Multiple Myeloma
Isa-VRd proves its value in newly diagnosed MM in the IMROZ trial
PERSEUS: High MRD negativity rates with D-VRd and consolidation therapy and D-R maintenance in MM
Post-intensification data confirm superiority of quadruple therapy in MM
Promising phase 1 results for novel CAR T-cell therapy in MM
DREAMM 8: Belantamab mafodotin offers hope for patients with RRMM
Leukaemia
PhALLCON: Third-generation TKI superior to first-generation TKI in Ph+ ALL
APOLLO: ATRA plus ATO meets expectations in high-risk APL
Excellent phase 3 results for asciminib in chronic myeloid leukaemia
AUGMENT-101: Revumenib trial in KMT2Ar leukaemia stopped early for efficacy
FLAG-Ida plus venetoclax induces high MRD-negativity rates in AML
CD40/CD47 inhibitor shows promise in high-risk MDS and AML
ENHANCE: Magrolimab does not ameliorate health outcomes in high-risk MDS
Can MRD-guided azacitidine treatment improve outcomes in AML and MDS?
Can WGTS replace standard-of-care diagnostics in AML?
Non-malignant Haematology
ENERGIZE: Mitapivat meets primary efficacy endpoint in thalassaemia
Sovleplenib delivers durable responses and QoL improvements in primary ITP
Avatrombopag successful in children with chronic ITP
RUBY: Promising data for first AsCas12a gene-editing therapy in sickle cell disease
Encouraging data for ELA026 to treat secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Myelofibrosis
Navitoclax plus ruxolitinib leads to spleen volume reductions in myelofibrosis
Is pelabresib plus ruxolitinib the paradigm-shifting combo therapy for myelofibrosis?
Lymphoma
The landscape of TP53 mutations and their prognostic impact in CLL
Can golcadomide plus R-CHOP become the first-line standard of care in high-risk BCL?
High survival rates following atezolizumab consolidation in DLBCL
First results for zanubrutinib plus venetoclax in del(17p)/TP53-mutated CLL/SLL
EPCORE CLL-1: Promising data for epcoritamab in high-risk Richter’s transformation
Updates from the EBMT Lymphoma Working Group: outcomes after allo- and auto-SCT for T-cell lymphoma subtypes
ECHO: Can we expect a novel standard of care in newly diagnosed MCL?
Clinically meaningful outcomes for mosunetuzumab across follicular lymphoma subgroups
Related Articles
August 5, 2022
Novel first-line treatment option for mantle cell lymphoma
September 14, 2023
How can we further improve lymphoma care?
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
