A subgroup analysis of the DETERMINATION trial, comparing lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) alone to RVd plus autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), suggested that one size does not fit all. According to the authors, further studies are warranted to personalise therapy for patients.
The DETERMINATION trial (NCT01208662) randomised 729 newly diagnosed patients with MM 1:1 to RVd alone or to RVD plus ASCT [1]. The primary outcome of progression-free survival (PFS) showed that patients in the RVd plus ASCT arm had a significant benefit over patients in the control arm, with a median PFS of 67.5 months versus 46.2 months (HR 1.53; P<0.0001) [2]. “MM is a heterogeneous disease and newly diagnosed patients with MM are diverse,” Dr Hani Hassoun (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA) pointed out. “Therefore, we need to investigate whether one size fits all.” A subgroup analysis for PFS was performed to gain insights into this matter.
“Although most subgroups appeared to benefit from transplant, some subgroups need to be considered,” continued Dr Hassoun. The benefit of transplant may be more apparent in White/Caucasian participants (HR 1.67) compared with Black/African American participants (HR 1.07). Also, those with a BMI <25 (HR 2.60) displayed a more pronounced advantage of transplant than those with a BMI between 25 and 30 (HR 1.24) or those with a BMI ≥30 (HR 1.41). Finally, patients with revised MM international staging system (R-ISS) III (HR 0.96) may have less benefit from transplant than those with R-ISS II (HR 1.63) or R-ISS I (HR 1.38). However, Dr Hassoun mentioned that R-ISS status and race were independent prognostic factors for PFS, favouring R-ISS I over R-ISS II and III in both arms, and favouring Black over White in the RVd alone arm.
-
- Hassoun H, et al. Response rates and outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patient subgroups receving RVd + ASCT plus lenadomide maintenance until progression in the phase 3 DETERMINATION trial. OS02-08, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) 49th Annual Meeting, 23–26 April 2023, Paris, France.
- Richardson PG, et al. N Engl J Med 2022;387:132–147.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
« Long-term success for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in CLL Next Article
ASCT or CAR T as first-line therapy for MM? »
Table of Contents: EBMT 2023
Featured articles
ASCT or CAR T as first-line therapy for MM?
Ide-cel superior to standard therapies in triple-class-exposed RRMM
Online First
ASCT or CAR T as first-line therapy for MM?
DETERMINATION: Does one size fit all in multiple myeloma?
Long-term success for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in CLL
Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A in AML
Can molecular data improve prognostication in MDS patients undergoing HSCT?
Ide-cel superior to standard therapies in triple-class-exposed RRMM
Quizartinib provides benefits on top of ASCT in AML
Blinatumomab may improve outcomes in patients with B-cell ALL undergoing ASCT
Is ASCT a reasonable option in patients with invasive aspergillosis?
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy