In the prognostication of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), findings from a large, international study showed that molecular data improved the prediction of overall survival (OS) modestly.
Dr Carmelo Gurnari (Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA) and co-investigators conducted a real-world study among 416 participants with MDS to assess the links between transplantation and the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) [1]. In the study cohort, 36% of the participants underwent the transplant upfront and 85% of the participants used hypomethylating agents as bridge therapy.
The IPSS-R, a prognostic scoring system that uses haematological and cytogenetic parameters, not including molecular information, stratified participants according to risk: very low (6%), low (17%), intermediate (19%), high (26%), and very high (32%) risk. The calculated IPSS-M scores, which differs from the IPSS-R by adding molecular data, resulted in a significant redistribution of participants with respect to these risk categories: very low (27%), low (18%), moderately low (14%), moderately high (15%), high (10%), and very high (16%). Furthermore, the c-index for overall survival was 0.583 for the IPSS-M and 0.547 for the IPSS-R, suggesting that the IPSS-M is slightly better at predicting OS outcomes than the IPSS-R. The c-index of IPSS-M for OS was lower than the observed c-indexes in the study by Bernard et al. and comparable with existing specific HSCT MDS risk scores [2].
-
- Gurnari C, et al. Outcome prediction in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant in the molecular era of IPSS-M. OS17-05, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) 49th annual meeting, 23–26 April 2023, Paris, France.
- Bernard E, et al. N Engl J Med Evid. 2022;1(7).
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
« Ide-cel superior to standard therapies in triple-class-exposed RRMM Next Article
Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A in AML »
Table of Contents: EBMT 2023
Featured articles
ASCT or CAR T as first-line therapy for MM?
Ide-cel superior to standard therapies in triple-class-exposed RRMM
Online First
ASCT or CAR T as first-line therapy for MM?
DETERMINATION: Does one size fit all in multiple myeloma?
Long-term success for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in CLL
Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A in AML
Can molecular data improve prognostication in MDS patients undergoing HSCT?
Ide-cel superior to standard therapies in triple-class-exposed RRMM
Quizartinib provides benefits on top of ASCT in AML
Blinatumomab may improve outcomes in patients with B-cell ALL undergoing ASCT
Is ASCT a reasonable option in patients with invasive aspergillosis?
Related Articles
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy