“The belief that ‘iron feeds bacteria’ has long shaped clinical practice concerning iron therapy during acute infections,” said Dr Haris Sohail (Charleston Area Medical Center, WV, USA) [1]. “However, there is not much evidence to support this claim.” Using the TriNetX research network, the researchers identified adult patients with iron deficiency anaemia and 1 of the following infections: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia (n=16,866), pneumonia (n=38,562), urinary tract infection (n=37,226), colitis (n=8,864), or cellulitis (n=16,808). In each infection cohort, half of the patients had received at least 1 formulation of IV iron, and half had not. Propensity score matching was performed for age, demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values. The primary outcomes were 14-day and 90-day survival.
Across all infection types, patients who received IV iron showed higher 14-day survival compared with those who did not:
- MRSA bacteraemia 97.6% vs 95.0%;
- Pneumonia 95.7% vs 91.5%;
- Urinary tract infection 97.6% vs 95.7%;
- Colitis 97.6% vs 95.5%;
- Cellulitis 98.5% vs 97.4%.
“This impact of IV iron on survival was maintained at day 90,” added Dr Sohail.
“Administering IV iron during acute infections appears to be safe and is associated with improved survival across all major infection cohorts,” he concluded. “In addition, haemoglobin recovery was enhanced, and transfusion requirements were reduced.” Dr Sohail emphasised, however, that prospective studies are needed to validate these real-world data.
- Sohail H, et al. Deciphering the dilemma: intravenous (IV) iron use in iron deficiency during acute infections. Abstract 5, American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting 2025, 6–9 December, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Is exposure to hydroxyurea during pregnancy really that harmful? Next Article
Novel foetal haemoglobin inducer for SCD offers hope »
« Is exposure to hydroxyurea during pregnancy really that harmful? Next Article
Novel foetal haemoglobin inducer for SCD offers hope »
Table of Contents: ASH 2025
Featured articles
Fixed-duration or continuous treatment for CLL?
Dilemma resolved? IV iron use for iron deficiency during acute infections
Leukaemia
New frontline regimen for Ph+ ALL tested in phase 3
Can we use non-TBI conditioning regimens in selected B-cell ALL patients?
A+ results for ponatinib and blinatumomab in Ph+ ALL
Myeloma and Plasma Cell Disorders
First CAR T-cell therapy for AL amyloidosis
Does earlier cilta-cel treatment improve outcomes in MM?
Promising data for a novel, innovative bispecific antibody in MM
MajesTEC results for teclistamab plus daratumumab in MM
First data from in vivo CAR T-cell therapy in MM
Non-Malignant Haematology
Novel foetal haemoglobin inducer for SCD offers hope
Dilemma resolved? IV iron use for iron deficiency during acute infections
Is exposure to hydroxyurea during pregnancy really that harmful?
VAYHIT2: Ianalumab shows efficacy in primary ITP
Lymphoma
Promising new combination therapy for FL
Off-the-shelf CAR T-cell product under investigation in B-cell NHL
Fixed-duration or continuous treatment for CLL?
KITE-363 and KITE-753 fly far in LBCL
Pole-position data for pirtobrutinib in CLL/SLL
Miscellaneous Topics
Tranexamic acid proves its value in non-cardiac surgery
PATHFINDER highlights the importance of treatment sequencing in systemic mastocytosis
Related Articles
August 5, 2021
Immune therapy of multiple myeloma
August 2, 2023
Robust platelet responses with cevidoplenib in ITP
September 2, 2025
HSCT may reduce risk of ocular complications in SCD
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
