Selinexor is an oral selective XPO1 inhibitor. XPO (exportin-1, the major nuclear exporter for tumour suppressor proteins, the glucocorticoid receptor, and elF4E-bound oncoprotein mRNAs such as c-Myc, Bcl, MDM2, and cyclins) is overexpressed in MM. In vitro and in vivo data demonstrate that selinexor reactivates tumour suppressor pathways and glucocorticoid receptor signalling in MM models that were resistant to other therapies [2]. The study presented by Dr Chen is a sub-study of the larger phase 2 Selinexor and Backbone Treatments of Multiple Myeloma Patients (STOMP study), which exclusively analysed the 51 patients treated with selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SPd) [3]. The rationale of this study was that additional oral combination strategies are needed to improve outcomes in MM.
The primary endpoint for the SPd sub-study was the maximum-tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. The secondary endpoint was objective response rate and duration of response for each arm independently. The key inclusion/exclusion criteria for the SPd arm were based on the fact that both selinexor and pomalidomide can be myelosuppressive; haemoglobin had to be ≥8.0 g/dL and platelet count had to be ≥75,000/mm3. The patients had to have had ≥2 cycles of lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor previously, which allowed the investigators to use the MM-003 study data with pomalidomide/dexamethasone as a historical comparator arm [4]. These were heavily pre-treated patients; the median time from diagnosis to SPd treatment was 4.8 years (1-23), and patients had been given a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (1-13).
Dose levels and scheduling were tested with either selinexor once or twice weekly schedules, together with a total weekly dose of 40 mg dexamethasone. Pomalidomide was taken 2-4 mg per day. Because nausea and gastrointestinal (GI) problems were to be expected, aggressive prophylactic antiemetic therapy was encouraged as supportive therapy. Two potentially toxicity-related deaths after the first cycle lead to the cessation of the twice-weekly selinexor schedule.
Of the pomalidomide-naïve patients (n=32), 56% had an objective response rate and 78% demonstrated clinical benefit. Surprisingly, re-challenge in pomalidomide-refractory patients (n=14) provided a 36% objective response rate and a 64% clinical benefit.
About half the patients on selinexor once weekly plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, and an additional quarter of those patients developed thrombocytopenia. Aggressive prophylactic antiemetic treatment ensured that GI toxicities were minor. Hyponatraemia was noted but was not clinically significant.
Median progression-free survival among all evaluable patients was 10.4 months. In the pomalidomide-naïve patients, the median progression-free survival was even higher, at 12.2 months (vs 4 months from the MM-003 trial).
All doses had similar toxicity profiles, but cytopenias were somewhat reduced with the lower selinexor dose of 60 mg and higher pomalidomide dose (4 mg once daily), which formed the basis of the recommended phase 2 dose decision.
In conclusion, once-weekly selinexor can be safely combined with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with heavily pre-treated MM. The recommended phase 2 dose for SPd is selinexor 60 mg once weekly, combined with pomalidomide 4 mg once daily + dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly. The most common adverse events were nausea, anorexia, fatigue, neutropenia, anaemia, and thrombocytopenia, all of which are thought to be manageable with appropriate supportive care and/or dose modification.
1. Chen CI, et al. Abstract 141, ASH 2019, 7-10 December, Orlando, USA.
2. Muz B, et al. Transl Oncol. 2017 Aug;10(4):632-640.
3. Chari A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 381:727-38.
4. San Miguel J. Lancet Oncol 2013 14: 1055-66.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Erythroferrone and skeletal changes associated with thalassaemia Next Article
Likely new standard of care: Blinatumomab for children with relapsed B-ALL »
« Erythroferrone and skeletal changes associated with thalassaemia Next Article
Likely new standard of care: Blinatumomab for children with relapsed B-ALL »
Table of Contents: ASH 2019
Featured articles
Late-Breaking Abstracts
Likely new standard of care: Blinatumomab for children with relapsed B-ALL
Pivotal phase 3 trial in cold agglutinin disease: sutimlimab can stop haemolysis
Oral azacitidine improves overall survival in patients with AML in remission
BCL11A as a novel target in gene therapy for sickle cell disease
Adding daratumumab to carfilzomib/dexamethasone prolongs PFS and OS in R/R MM
Long-term data of ropeginterferon alpha-2b in polycythaemia vera
Anti-CD70 is safe with hypomethylating agents in AML
MRD assessment to guide pre-emptive treatment decisions
Luspatercept effective for myelofibrosis-associated anaemia
Arsenic, ATRA, and ascorbic acid in acute promyelocytic leukaemia maintenance
Updated results ECOG-ACRIN E2906: decitabine maintenance after alloSCT
Sickle Cell Disease
Arginine supplements help against sickle cell disease pain
Abatacept prevents graft-versus-host disease in sickle cell patients after alloSCT
Plenary Scientific Session
HOVON-96: Better outcomes with cyclophosphamide after transplantation
Erythroferrone and skeletal changes associated with thalassaemia
Experimental model for limitations of haematopoietic stem cells propagation
Mosunetuzumab: complete remissions in non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Inclusive Medicine
Socioeconomic disparities and survival in paediatric AML
Oral selinexor/pomalidomide/dexamethasone shows activity in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma
CAR T-cell therapy successful in older non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients
Mild renal impairment in African Americans does not affect OS in AML
ALCYONE: New overall survival results for myeloma
Venous Thromboembolism
Rivaroxaban is safe and effective for paediatric venous thromboembolism
Aspirin plus DOAC is not better than a DOAC alone
20-Year follow-up of imatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia after failure with interferon
CAR T and Beyond
BCMA-targeted CAR T therapy yields 100% response in relapsed/refractory MM
Anti-BCMA/anti-CD38 in refractory multiple myeloma
Related Articles
September 9, 2020
Isatuximab triplet improves PFS in R/R MM
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com