“In the Netherlands, we see about 3,000 new patients with rectal cancer each year. About 30% of them have cT1-2N0 stage cancer and are eligible for diagnostic local excision,” said Dr Sander Albers (Amsterdam University Medical Centre, the Netherlands) [1]. However, the role of local excision in pT2 cancer remains controversial due to a 20–30% risk of LNM. The current study aimed to better define LNM risk in pT2 rectal cancer following local excision to guide subsequent treatment decisions.
The multicentre, retrospective cohort study included 103 participants with locally excised pT2 rectal cancer who had not received neoadjuvant therapy. All participants underwent a standardised histopathological revision of the local excision specimens, and LNM status was determined by completion of TME or MRI follow-up exceeding 24 months. “The assessed histological risk factors included poor tumour differentiation and/or mucinous subtype, lymphovascular invasion, tumour budding and/or poorly differentiated clusters (grade 2 or 3), and perineural invasion,” explained Dr Albers.
Most participants underwent completion TME (74%), while the remainder opted for active surveillance (26%). The overall LNM rate was 18%. Among participants without histological risk factors (n=36), the LNM risk was only 5.6%. Furthermore, after a median follow-up of 53 months, no locoregional recurrences occurred in participants in the active surveillance group who lacked risk factors (n=10).
“The risk of LNM was low in patients with pT2 cancer who underwent local excision and had no histological risk factors,” concluded Dr Albers. “Since about 1/3 of the patients with pT2 rectal cancer fall into this low-risk category, a risk-stratified approach could substantially reduce the number of completion TME procedures performed.” Prospective validation is warranted before clinical implementation.
- Albers SC, et al. Histological risk stratification for lymph node metastasis in PT2 rectal cancer after local excision: a multicentre international study (historic). LB14, Colorectal ESD: The better way? UEG Week, 4–7 October 2025, Berlin, Germany.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« PuraStat is effective and safe in real-world radiation proctopathy Next Article
Endoscopic approach preferred over surgery in gastric outlet syndrome »
« PuraStat is effective and safe in real-world radiation proctopathy Next Article
Endoscopic approach preferred over surgery in gastric outlet syndrome »
Table of Contents: UEGW 2025
Featured articles
Mufemilast advances to phase 3 following positive phase 2 results in UC
Diverse Top Research From UEG Week
Rabeprazole may be the preferred high-dose PPI in severe eGERD
Promising signs from a novel Helicobacter Pylori vaccine
Improving prevention and sustainability go hand-in-hand in IBD care
TRIASSIC: ESD superior to TAMIS for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions
Promising novel treatment option for functional dyspepsia
Latest Advancements in IBD
Intake of specific fibre subtypes linked to reduced risk of CD onset
Prospective insight into dietary patterns and relapse risk in IBD
Mufemilast advances to phase 3 following positive phase 2 results in UC
High-dose obefazimod is efficacious in UC regardless of prior therapy exposure
Can SIK3 inhibition become the Holy Grail for autoimmune diseases?
Relapse rate and risk factors after anti-TNF withdrawal in UC
TURN2: Well-prepared FMT shows efficacy in UC
Different outcomes of AI-read versus human-read endoscopies in the TITRATE study
Treatment efficacy of 7 therapies in perianal fistulising CD
ASTRO: Subcutaneous guselkumab maintains efficacy in UC through 2 years of follow-up
ANTHEM-UC: Oral IL-23 inhibitor delivers encouraging phase 2 data
Malignancies and Related Topics
Early detection of pancreatic cancer with an AI tool may save lives
Endoscopic approach preferred over surgery in gastric outlet syndrome
Reducing TME burden with a risk-stratified approach in early rectal cancer
PuraStat is effective and safe in real-world radiation proctopathy
Extended surveillance intervals after colorectal ESD may be safe and feasible
A machine learning model to improve bowel preparation quality monitoring
Can vedolizumab simplify the management of checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis?
Risk-stratified screening for CRC is more effective at the same spending rate
Highlights in Hepatology
Sugar-sweetened and non-sugar–sweetened beverages linked to MASLD risk
GLISTEN: Linerixibat meets primary endpoint in PBC-associated cholestatic pruritus
Even limited alcohol consumption is linked to increased MASLD risk
GLP-1 agonists in MASH: State-of-affairs
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
