According to Dr Muhammad Husnain Khizar (Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, UK), about 20% of patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy suffer from radiation proctopathy [1]. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) remains the current standard-of-care, but it carries a high recurrence rate and notable procedural risks. “We need safer, durable, and non-thermal alternatives,” said Dr Husnain Khizar. PuraStat is a synthetic, self-assembling peptide hydrogel that promotes haemostasis and mucosal healing. “It is non-thermal, biocompatible, and easy to apply,” he explained.
In a real-world, prospective series, 100 patients with chronic radiation proctopathy were evaluated: 50 received de novo PuraStat treatment, while the remaining 50 switched from APC to PuraStat. “After 6 months of follow-up, we observed complete symptomatic relief in both cohorts,” reported Dr Husnain Khizar. Moreover, 92% of patients in the ‘de novo’ group achieved mucosal healing. The mean number of PuraStat sessions was 1.3 to 1.5 per patient. Importantly, no adverse events such as perforation, infection, or pain were reported. “We also observed excellent outcomes in patients with refractory radiation-associated vascular ectasias (RAVE),” he added.
In conclusion, PuraStat appears to be a safe and effective first-line therapy or rescue therapy following APC in patients with radiation proctopathy. It may promote mucosal healing while minimising the need for repeat procedures.
- Husnain Khizar M, et al. Transforming radiation proctopathy management: real-world evidence on PuraStat. LB13, Colorectal ESD: The better way? UEG Week, 4-7 October 2025, Berlin, Germany.
Medical writing support was provided by Robert van den Heuvel.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Publishing Group
Posted on
Previous Article
« Extended surveillance intervals after colorectal ESD may be safe and feasible Next Article
Reducing TME burden with a risk-stratified approach in early rectal cancer »
« Extended surveillance intervals after colorectal ESD may be safe and feasible Next Article
Reducing TME burden with a risk-stratified approach in early rectal cancer »
Table of Contents: UEGW 2025
Featured articles
Relapse rate and risk factors after anti-TNF withdrawal in UC
Reducing TME burden with a risk-stratified approach in early rectal cancer
Different outcomes of AI-read vs human-read endoscopies in the TITRATE study
Online First
Sugar-sweetened and non-sugar-sweetened beverages linked to MASLD risk
Rabeprazole may be the preferred high-dose PPI in severe eGERD
Promising signs from a novel Helicobacter Pylori vaccine
Relapse rate and risk factors after anti-TNF withdrawal in UC
TURN2: Well-prepared FMT shows efficacy in UC
Can vedolizumab simplify the management of checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis?
GLISTEN: Linerixibat meets primary endpoint in PBC-associated cholestatic pruritus
Reducing TME burden with a risk-stratified approach in early rectal cancer
PuraStat is effective and safe in real-world radiation proctopathy
Extended surveillance intervals after colorectal ESD may be safe and feasible
Different outcomes of AI-read vs human-read endoscopies in the TITRATE study
Can SIK3 inhibition become the Holy Grail for autoimmune diseases?
Mufemilast advances to phase 3 following positive phase 2 results in UC
High-dose obefazimod is efficacious in UC regardless of prior therapy exposure
Endoscopic approach preferred over surgery in gastric outlet syndrome
Related Articles
September 29, 2021
Extent of lymphadenectomy predicts survival in esophageal cancer
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
