Risankizumab superior to ustekinumab in skin histopathology scores

Therapy with risankizumab produced faster histopathological improvement of psoriatic lesions and a more complete resolution of inflammation as judged by markers analysed by immunohistochemistry, as compared with ustekinumab. RNA sequencing also revealed a greater modulation of the psoriasis transcriptome by risankizumab.

The presented data compared molecular and histopathologic patterns in psoriatic skin from the phase 3 UltiMMa-1 trial (NCT02684370), a head-to-head comparison of treatment with risankizumab and ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [1]. The 2 monoclonal antibodies bind to different subunits of IL-23: risankizumab to p19 and ustekinumab to p40, a subunit that is shared by IL-23 and IL-12 [2,3].

In UltiMMa-1, participants received either 150 mg of risankizumab or 45/90 mg of ustekinumab at weeks 0, 4, 16, 28, and 40 [1]. From consenting participants, skin biopsies were also obtained at baseline in lesional and non-lesional skin and at weeks 12 and 46 in lesional skin. “The analysis methods were histopathological analysis of sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and immunohistochemistry performed for the proliferation marker Ki67, the T-cell marker CD3, the dendritic cell markers CD11c and DC-LAMP, which stains matured dendritic cells,” Dr Kathleen Smith (AbbVie Bioresearch Center, MA, USA) explained. Gene expression in the biopsies was analysed using RNA sequencing.

The 2 study arms were fairly similar in terms of mean age (53 and 51 years), body mass index (31 and 30 kg/m²), and percentage of women (33% and 38%). However,  the involved body surface area was 27.3% in the risankizumab and 18.8% in the ustekinumab group.

At weeks 12 and 46, both agents significantly decreased the number of cells positive for CD3, CD11c, DC-LAMP, and Ki67. At week 12, a difference in histopathology scores was found between risankizumab and ustekinumab treated patients. On risankizumab, 76% achieved an excellent or likely excellent improvement versus 45% on ustekinumab. “These improvements were maintained by week 46,” Dr Smith further indicated.

The transcriptome analysis included participants with a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 response at week 46. “We defined the psoriasis transcriptome as the 3,146 genes which were differentially expressed in lesional versus non-lesional skin at baseline,” Dr Smith stated. Risankizumab therapy led to 79% changes in the transcriptome and ustekinumab in 69%, respectively. A more detailed look at transcriptome modulation at week 12 revealed that the 2 agents downregulated, for example, CCL20, FoxP3, IL-17A, IL-23A, and the IL-36 transcripts. “However, there is a large group of genes that were modified only by risankizumab and these included T-cell gene CD28, CD3, activation marker CD69, and CD 8 itself (see Figure). This supports the histological analysis where we see slightly better improvement in T-cell infiltration,” Dr Smith highlighted. Treatment with risankizumab also downregulated the kinetochore metaphase signalling pathway and the role of IL-17A in psoriasis (see Figure).

Figure: Modulation of the psoriasis transcriptome on treatment with risankizumab or ustekinumab [1]
RZB, risankizumab; UST, ustekinumab.

 

“A higher proportion of patients treated with risankizumab experienced an excellent improvement in histopathology scores compared with patients with ustekinumab, which parallels clinical efficacy, and treatment with risankizumab modulated a greater number of psoriasis transcriptome genes, including those specifically targeting inflammation pathways compared with ustekinumab,” Dr Smith concluded.

 

1. 
   
   1. Smith, K. Interleukin-23 pathway inhibition by risankizumab differentially modulates the molecular profile in psoriatic skin compared with ustekinumab. FC28, Psoriasis from Gene to Clinic 2021, 9–11 December.
   2. Wcisło-Dziadecka DL, et al. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020;29(2):235–241.
   3. Strober B, et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020; 34(12):2830–2838.

 

Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on 2 February, 2022