Home > Cardiology > HFA 2025 > More Hot Trials from HFA > High vs low positive end-expiratory pressure in IMV may impact survival

High vs low positive end-expiratory pressure in IMV may impact survival

Presented by
Dr Min-Seok Kim, Asan Medical Centre, South Korea
Conference
HFA 2025
Doi
https://doi.org/10.55788/37b4da53
A high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is likely preferred over a low PEEP in patients with acute heart failure (HF) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The low PEEP was associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality and adverse events, and so the trial was terminated early.

“The clinical implications of PEEP during IMV have not been thoroughly investigated,” stated Dr Min-Seok Kim (Asan Medical Centre, South Korea) [1]. The HELP-AHF trial (NCT04853563) aimed to evaluate high and low PEEP in patients with acute HF who required IMV. Participants were randomised 1:1 to high PEEP, starting at 8 cmH2O and increasing to 10 cmH2O, or low PEEP, starting at 5 cmH2O and lowered to 3 cmH2O. The study’s primary endpoint was ventilator-free days at 28 days of follow-up.

“The study was terminated early after enrolling 60 participants, due to a significant imbalance in in-hospital mortality and adverse events between the study arms,” said Dr Kim. In-hospital mortality was more frequently observed in participants in the low PEEP arm (20.7% vs 0.0%; P=0.02; see Figure). There were also significantly more adverse events in the low PEEP group than in the high PEEP group (41.4% vs 6.7%; P=0.002), including higher rates of severe hypoxaemia, weaning failure, and tracheostomy. At the time of trial termination, ventilator-free days were more common in the high PEEP arm than in the low PEEP arm (25.5 vs 24.0; P=0.02).

Figure: Characteristics of participants with in-hospital mortality [1]



PEEP; positive end-expiratory pressure; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Although the sample size of the HELP-AHF study was small, it appears that the high PEEP strategy leads to better health outcomes than the low PEEP strategy in this patient population.

  1. Kim M-S, et al. Comparison of high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with acute heart failure: a HELP-AHF randomised clinical trial. Hottest trials and trial updates (2), Heart Failure 2025, 17–20 May, Belgrade, Serbia.

Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on