The phase 3 MAPLE-HCM trial (NCT05767346) randomised 175 patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM 1:1 to the cardiac myosin inhibitor aficamten or the beta-blocker metoprolol. Included patients were either treatment naïve or underwent a 2-week washout period of prior therapy. Exercise capacity (pVO2) was the primary outcome. Dr Pablo Garcia-Pavia (University Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Spain) presented the primary findings [1].
After 24 weeks of therapy, the mean change from baseline in pVO2 was +1.1 ml/kg/min in the aficamten group and -1.2 ml/kg/min in the metoprolol group, representing a clinically meaningful difference of 2.3 ml/kg/min (P<0.0001). In addition, there were significant improvements in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - Clinical Symptom Score (CSS), NT-proBNP levels, post-Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient, and left atrial volume index (LAVI) with aficamten compared with metoprolol.
“Aficamten was generally well tolerated,” said Dr Garcia-Pavia. “One patient discontinued due to adverse events, versus 3 patients in the metoprolol group.” Moreover, only 4 patients on aficamten had at least 1 dose down-titration compared with 26 patients in the metoprolol arm. “We did see a mean change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of -5.3% in the aficamten arm, but only 1 patient had an LVEF < 50% as measured by the core lab,” added Dr Garcia-Pavia.
“These findings support the use of aficamten monotherapy as a potential first-line standard-of-care in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM,” concluded Dr Garcia-Pavia.
- Garcia-Pavia P, et al. Aficamten vs metoprolol as monotherapy for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hotline 2, ESC Congress 2025, 29 August – 1 September, Madrid, Spain.
Medical writing support was provided by Robert van den Heuvel.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« ODYSSEY-HCM: Mavacamten misses primary endpoint in non-obstructive HCM Next Article
REBOOT: Shaking the pillars of post-MI treatment »
« ODYSSEY-HCM: Mavacamten misses primary endpoint in non-obstructive HCM Next Article
REBOOT: Shaking the pillars of post-MI treatment »
Table of Contents: ESC 2025
Featured articles
DUAL-ACS: real-world study comparing 3-month vs 12-month DAPT in ACS
Heart Failure Trials
VICTOR + VICTORIA: Vericiguat offers benefits to a broad spectrum of HFrEF patients
Does in-hospital initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors reduce adverse events in HF?
DIGIT-HF: digitoxin efficacious in HFrEF
PARACHUTE-HF: positive trial result for sacubitril/valsartan in Chagasic HFrEF
Screening and Prevention Studies
POTCAST: Effective prevention of arrhythmias with targeted potassium intervention
PREVENT-MINS: Ivabradine does not reduce MINS in non-cardiac surgery
DANCAVAS 2: Invitation to screening alone is not sufficient for outcome benefit
VICTORION confirms LDL-cholesterol-lowering potential of inclisiran
Oral Myosin Inhibitors in HCM
ODYSSEY-HCM: Mavacamten misses primary endpoint in non-obstructive HCM
MAPLE-HCM: Aficamten meets efficacy endpoints in obstructive HCM
Simplifying Treatment Strategies
Shaking the pillars of post-MI treatment
DUAL-ACS: real-world study comparing 3-month vs 12-month DAPT in ACS
NEO-MINDSET: Very early aspirin discontinuation after PCI for ACS fails to meet non-inferiority versus continued DAPT
ALONE-AF: Is it safe to discontinue oral anticoagulation in non-recurrent AF?
TARGET-FIRST: PCI-treated patients after low-risk MI with infrequent events and similar outcomes with early aspirin discontinuation
Other HOTLINE Studies
STRIDE: Functional improvements with semaglutide in PAD plus T2D, irrespective of sex
SWEDEPAD 1 and 2: Similar outcomes for drug-coated and uncoated devices in PAD
NEWTON-CABG: Aiming for improved SVG patency with PCSK9 inhibitors
Guideline Updates
2025 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease
Novel ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy
2025 ESC guidelines for the management of myocarditis and pericarditis
ESC clinical consensus statement on mental health and CVD
Focused update of the guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias
Related Articles
October 10, 2019
More severe coronary artery calcifications with VKA than NOAC
February 26, 2020
New guidelines on the prevention of cardiovascular conditions
May 29, 2018
Editor Biography
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
