Home > Cardiology > ESC 2024 > Clever Ideas for Coronary Artery Disease > REC-CAGEFREE I: Can we avoid permanent stenting with drug-coated balloons?

REC-CAGEFREE I: Can we avoid permanent stenting with drug-coated balloons?

Presented by
Dr Ling Tao, Xijing Hospital, China
Conference
ESC 2024
Trial
REC-CAGEFREE I
Doi
https://doi.org/10.55788/87a92583
A strategy utilising a drug-coated balloon (DCB) with rescue stenting was inferior to standard drug-eluting stenting (DES) in patients with newly diagnosed coronary artery disease (CAD). Although longer follow-up is needed, findings from the REC-CAGEFREE I trial suggested that DES remains the preferred treatment strategy.

“A balloon coated with antiproliferative drugs may be used in patients with CAD to avoid the implant of a permanent scaffold,” argued Dr Ling Tao (Xijing Hospital, China) [1]. To test this hypothesis, the investigator-initiated, multicentre REC-CAGEFREE I trial (NCT04561739) randomised patients with de novo, non-complex CAD who underwent successful pre-dilation (n=2,272) 1:1 to DCB with rescue stenting or to standard DES. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically and physiologically indicated target lesion revascularisation at 2 years.

At 2 years, the DCB arm displayed inferior outcomes to the standard-of-care arm, with primary outcome event rates of 6.4% versus 3.4% (Pnon-inferiority=0.65) [1,2]. Differences between the 2 arms were seen in cardiac death (2.3% vs 1.2%; P=0.053) and revascularisation (3.1% vs 1.2%; P=0.002) rates, whereas target-vessel MI rates appeared to be similar (1.9% vs 1.6%; P=0.61). “The significant difference between the 2 arms regarding the primary endpoint was mainly present in patients with non-small vessel disease [7.5% vs 2.5%], whereas patients with small vessel disease had comparable outcomes [5.1% vs 4.4%],” added Dr Tao [1].

“DES implantation should remain the preferred treatment strategy for newly diagnosed patients with CAD, especially if they have non-small vessel disease,” concluded Dr Tao. “Longer follow-up will reveal whether the higher revascularisation rates translate into higher MI or mortality rates.”


    1. Tao L, et al. DCB with rescue stenting versus intended stenting for de novo CAD: a multicenter, non-inferiority trial. HOTLINE 11, ESC Congress 2024, 30 Aug–02 Sept, London, UK.
    2. Gao C, et al. Lancet 2024;404(10457):1040-1050.

Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on