https://doi.org/10.55788/63ca3c01
The new guidelines issued 57 new and 43 revised recommendations on different aspects of hypertension management [1–3]. “We have a lot of work to do,” stated Prof. John William McEvoy (National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland), considering the still poor implementation of effective BP treatment worldwide.
For measuring BP, new recommendations do not only include the use of calibrated devices to enforce correct measurement technique (class I) but also highlight out-of-office measuring for diagnosis and patient-centred care:
- It is recommended to measure BP using a validated and calibrated device, to enforce the correct measurement technique, and to apply a consistent approach to BP measurement for each patient (class I).
- Out-of-office BP measurement is recommended for diagnostic purposes, particularly because it can detect both white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension. Where out-of-office measurements are not logistically or economically feasible, it is recommended to confirm the diagnosis with a repeat office BP measurement using the correct standardised measurement technique (class I).
- Home BP measurement for managing hypertension by using self-monitored BP is recommended to achieve better BP control (class I).
- Self-measurement, when properly performed, is recommended due to its positive effects on the acceptance of a diagnosis of hypertension, patient empowerment, and adherence to treatment (class I).
A new blood pressure classification
Instead of the former 7 categories for BP, the new Guidelines now define 3 categories. They illustrate that the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk augmentation through BP is incremental:
- non-elevated BP (office BP <20/70 mmHg);
- elevated BP (120–139/70–89 mmHg);
- hypertension (≥140/≥90 mmHg).
For the confirmation of elevated BP and hypertension, out-of-office measurement is required. Further management is tailored according to categories. “Hypertensive individuals, regardless of age, regardless of risk, deserve a drug treatment immediately and, of course, this does not apply to the elevated BP subgroup,” Prof. Rosa Maria Bruno (Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, France) indicated. Persons with elevated BP are subject to a stepwise risk assessment that includes the prediction of the 10-year risk of CVD, the evaluation of risk modifiers, and the consideration of further CVD testing, to determine the adequate measures indicated.
Two new class I recommendations particularly elaborate on the CVD risk assessment in elevated BP:
- It is recommended to use a risk-based approach in the treatment of elevated BP, and individuals with moderate or severe chronic kidney disease, established CVD, hypertension-mediated organ damage, diabetes mellitus, or familial hypercholesterolaemia are considered at increased risk for CVD events (class I).
- It is recommended that, irrespective of age, individuals with elevated BP and a SCORE2 or SCORE2-OP CVD risk of ≥10% are considered at increased risk for CVD for the purpose of risk-based management of their elevated BP (class I).
As there is an important focus on patient-centred care within the new guideline, a class I recommendation includes an informed discussion about CVD risk and treatment benefits tailored to the needs of a patient as part of hypertension management.
Non-pharmacological interventions
Lifestyle and non-drug measures to lower BP play an important role in the management of elevated BP. “Highlighted in our recommendations is an increase in potassium intake and there's now a lot of evidence to indicate indeed that increasing potassium intake, particularly in patients with hypertension without moderate-to-advanced kidney disease is really what should be focused upon,” Prof. Rhian Touyz (McGill University, Canada) emphasised.
- In patients with hypertension without moderate-to-advanced CKD and with high daily sodium intake, an increase of potassium intake of 0.5–1.0 g/day —for example through sodium substitution with potassium-enriched salt (comprising 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride) or through diets rich in fruits and vegetables— should be considered (class IIa).
- It is recommended to restrict sugar consumption, in particular sugar-sweetened beverages, to a maximum of 10% of energy intake (class I).
Treatment targets and pharmacological management
Guidance on when to start BP treatment is given in various new recommendations:
- In adults with elevated BP and low/medium CVD risk (<10% over 10 years), BP lowering with lifestyle measures is recommended and can reduce the risk of CVD (class I).
- In adults with elevated BP and sufficiently high CVD risk, after 3 months of lifestyle intervention, BP lowering with pharmacological treatment is recommended for those with confirmed BP ≥130/80 mmHg to reduce CVD risk (class I).
- It is recommended that in hypertensive patients with confirmed BP ≥140/90 mmHg, irrespective of CVD risk, lifestyle measures and pharmacological BP-lowering treatment are initiated promptly to reduce CVD risk (class I).
As for the treatment target, the committee implemented a simplified, yet intensified approach with a target of 120–129 mmHg in systolic BP. “This applies to most patients indeed, including patients with diabetes, patients with CKD, with previous stroke, and with cardiac disease,” Prof. Bruno informed adding that “the lower the better.” In patients with poor tolerance of this target, one should aim at going as low as possible (i.e. ALARA principle).
“We suggest that when patients have been diagnosed with hypertension, they start with a low dose of double combination therapy, and if BP has still not reached the target, low-dose triple combination therapy is suggested,” said Prof. Touyz (see Figure). An initial monotherapy is, for example, recommended for elevated BP, frailty, and orthostatic hypotension. Finally, when performed in medium-to-high volume centres, renal denervation may also be considered in consenting adults with resistant hypertension on 3 drugs, or with a combination of increased CVD risk and uncontrolled BP on fewer than 3 drugs (class IIb).
Figure: Algorithm for pharmacological BP lowering. Modified from [3]
ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; MI, myocardial infarction.
- Presentations in Session ‘2024 ESC Guidelines Overview,’ ESC Congress 2024, 30 Aug–02 Sept, London, UK.
- Presentations in Session ‘2024 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension,’ ESC Congress 2024, 30 Aug–02 Sept, London, UK.
- McEvoy JW, et al. Eur Heart J. 2024; Aug 30. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae178.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes Next Article
Letter from the Editor »
« Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes Next Article
Letter from the Editor »
Table of Contents: ESC 2024
Featured articles
Meet the Expert: Dr Abdullahi Mohamed on Iron Deficiency in Patients with HF
2024 ESC Guidelines in a Nutshell
Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension
Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes
Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation
Guidelines for the management of peripheral artery and aortic diseases
Crossing Borders in Arrhythmia
EPIC-CAD: What is the best antithrombotic approach in high-risk AF plus stable CAD?
OCEANIC-AF: Asundexian inferior to apixaban for ischaemic stroke prevention in AF
MIRACLE-AF: Elegant solution to improve AF care in rural China
SUPPRESS-AF: What is the value of adding LVA ablation to PVI in AF?
Clever Ideas for Coronary Artery Disease
ABYSS: Can beta-blocker safely be interrupted post-MI?
SWEDEGRAFT: Can a no-touch vein harvesting technique improve outcomes in CABG?
Bioadaptor meets expectations in reducing target lesion failures in coronary artery disease
REC-CAGEFREE I: Can we avoid permanent stenting with drug-coated balloons?
OCCUPI: OCT-guided PCI improves outcomes in complex CAD
Highway to Hypertension Control
Low-dose 3-drug pill GMRx2 shows promise in lowering BP
Is administering BP medication in the evening better than in the morning?
VERONICA: Improving BP control in Africa with a simple strategy
High-end Trials in Heart Failure
FINEARTS-HF: Finerenone improves outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
MRAs show varied efficacy in heart failure across ejection fractions
MATTERHORN: Transcatheter repair matches surgery for HF with secondary mitral regurgitation
RESHAPE-HF2: Not a “tie-breaker” for TEER in heart failure
Practical Gains in Screening and Diagnostics
STEEER-AF: Shockingly low adherence to ESC atrial fibrillation guidelines
SCOFF: To fast or not to fast, that’s the question
WESTCOR-POC: Point-of-care hs-troponin testing increases emergency department efficiency
PROTEUS: Can AI improve decision-making around stress echocardiography?
RAPIDxAI: Can AI-augmented chest pain assessment improve cardiovascular outcomes?
Miscellaneous Achievements in Cardiology
HELIOS-B: Vutrisiran candidate for SoC in ATTR cardiomyopathy
Does RAS inhibitor discontinuation affect outcomes after non-cardiac surgery?
Novel approach to managing severe tricuspid regurgitation proves its value
NOTION-3: TAVI plus PCI improves outcomes in CAD plus severe aortic stenosis
RHEIA: TAVI outperformed surgery in women with aortic stenosis
Related Articles
November 7, 2024
HELIOS-B: Vutrisiran candidate for SoC in ATTR cardiomyopathy
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com