Home > Cardiology > ESC 2021 > COVID-19 and the Heart > COVID-19: Thromboembolic risk reduction with therapeutic heparin dosing

COVID-19: Thromboembolic risk reduction with therapeutic heparin dosing

Presented by
Prof. Alex Spyropoulos, Northwell Health, USA
Conference
ESC 2021
Trial
Phase 3, HEP-COVID
The risk of major thromboembolic events in hospitalised COVID-19 patients was significantly reduced when thromboprophylaxis was given at a therapeutic dose of heparin instead of standard therapy. Within the HEP-COVID trial, this advantage was only found in non-ICU patients [1].

“Despite universal thromboprophylaxis with standard heparin, ‘breakthrough thrombotic events’ occur,” stated Prof. Alex Spyropoulos (Northwell Health, NY, USA). The HEP-COVID trial (NCT04401293) was designed to investigate thromboprophylaxis in high-risk, hospitalised patients with COVID-19, as the optimal regime for this population is still unknown. The study included 253 adult patients hospitalised with COVID-19 requiring oxygen supplementation, who had either D-dimer of 4x the upper normal limit or a sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score of ≥4. They were randomised to 2 subgroups of ICU and non-ICU treatment and further to subcutaneous enoxaparin 1mg/kg twice daily or standard-of-care /intermediate-dose heparin (SOC group) over 10+4 days or until discharge. Before discharge, a compression ultrasound was performed of the lower extremities. The primary composite efficacy endpoint consisted of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolic events (ATE), and all-cause mortality after 30 days. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding.

The mean age of the modified intention-to-treat population was 66 years. Over 50% of participants were men, and the mean body mass index was around 30 kg/m2. Among the most frequent VTE risk factors were a history of VTE or cancer. The mean SIC score was 2.3 in both groups and D-dimer in the enoxaparin arm was 3,837 ng/mL versus 3,183 ng/mL in the SOC group. About one-third of the study subjects required ICU care and the mean length of in-patient care was close to 12 days.

The results demonstrated a relative risk (RR) of 0.68 (95% CI 0.49–0.96; P=0.0273) for the primary composite efficacy outcome with a 13.2 absolute risk reduction in favour of enoxaparin. Looking at ICU and non-ICU strata, the effect was driven by the non-ICU group with a RR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.27–0.81; P=0.0042), yet no significance in the ICU stratum (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.62–1.39). The components VTE+ATE also revealed a significant risk reduction of 63% (P=0.0003), but all-cause mortality showed only a numerical between-group difference.

“The principal safety outcome of major bleeding occurred in 2 patients in the standard-dose group and 6 patients in the therapeutic-dose group with an incidence of 1.6% and 4.7%, and this was not statistically significant,” said Prof. Spyropoulos. In summary, he stressed that this trial was the first to show the superiority of a therapeutic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin over SOC thromboprophylaxis with overall low rates of bleeding in those selected for the trial.


    1. Spyropoulos AC. The HEP-COVID Trial. Latest Science in COVID-19, ESC Congress 2021, 27–30 August.

 

Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on