https://doi.org/10.55788/7386754b
The SmartfIRE study (NCT05752487) is a prospective, interventional trial with a single-arm design, conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a dual energy (DE) focal contact force catheter, the DE STSF catheter. This device can deliver both radiofrequency (RF) and pulsed field (PF) energy. While the findings from the 3-month follow-up have been shared previously [1], the outcomes were observed over 12 months and presented during the EHRA meeting by Prof. Tom de Potter (Cardiovascular Research Centre Aalst, Belgium) [2]. Primary endpoints were reported at 3 months: At this time, there was a 100% acute procedural success with an incidence of primary adverse events (PAE) within seven days of the procedure of 4.4% [1]. All included patients had drug-refractory, symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).
At 12 months, 71.6% (96/134) of patients were free from symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL)/and atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. Thus, the performance goal was met.
The safety profile was acceptable: In the 12-months safety analysis, 5 serious adverse events were observed in 5 patients (3.6%). Of note, there was no PF energy-related event, coronary spasm, oesophageal injury, phrenic nerve injury, or haemolysis.
A post-hoc analysis demonstrated that effectiveness results were superior in patients with high adherence to recommended ablation parameters (maintaining an ITD≤6 mm in ≥95% of applications and achieving a target index of ≥400 posteriorly and ≥500 anteriorly in >70% of applications). They achieved a 12-month freedom from recurrence of 86.9%. As Prof. de Potter emphasised, patients experienced also a significant increase in quality of life and reductions in cardiovascular hospitalisation and antiarrhythmic drug use post-ablation.
- De Potter T, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and healthcare benefits of a dual energy focal ablation technology to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: SmartfIRE 12-month results. Late-breaking science 1, EHRA 2025, 30 March –01 April, Vienna, Austria.
- Duytschaever M, et al. Europace 2024;26:euae088.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Ablation for paroxysmal AF: endpoint of non-inferiority of vHPSD to cryoballoon not met Next Article
PFA non-inferior to CBA in symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation »
« Ablation for paroxysmal AF: endpoint of non-inferiority of vHPSD to cryoballoon not met Next Article
PFA non-inferior to CBA in symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation »
Table of Contents: EHRA 2025
Featured articles
Symptomatic embolisms after AF ablation: new insights on outcomes and predictors
Marked clinical benefit by MPP compared with BVP
Diagnostics, Monitoring, and Prevention
Myocardial fibrosis triples arrhythmia risk in NICM patients
SafeHeart predicts arrhythmias and clinical deterioration
Atrial fibrillation screening: beneficial in high-risk patients
Educational e-mail before AF conversion treatment ups anti-coagulation adherence
AF and dementia: largest Mediterranean cohort reveals age-dependent association
Atrial Fibrillation
PFA non-inferior to CBA in symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Paroxysmal AF ablation: dual energy catheter demonstrates benefit at 12 months
Ablation for paroxysmal AF: endpoint of non-inferiority of vHPSD to cryoballoon not met
Symptomatic embolisms after AF ablation: new insights on outcomes and predictors
Ventricular Arrhythmias
S-ICD: an alternative for sudden cardiac death prevention in Brugada syndrome
PFA shows potential in safety and efficacy of catheter ablations for ventricular arrhythmias
Electrical storm patients at increased risk of VT recurrence after catheter success
Treatment of VT: iATP shows promising results in the fast ventricular tachycardia zone
Devices & Resynchronisation Therapy
Marked clinical benefit by MPP compared with BVP
Landmark Chinese trial reveals that LBBP slashes hospitalisation
Need for post-TAVI pacemaker implantation linked to poorer outcomes
Anticoagulation & Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Apixaban vs aspirin: more bleedings overall but fewer at critical sites
SWISS-APERO demonstrates comparable safety, potential efficacy edge for Amulet
Related Articles
February 17, 2021
Active screening for AF improves clinical outcomes
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com