https://doi.org/10.55788/95c53ee4
AF confers an increased risk of mortality, stroke, heart failure, and cognitive decline [1]. There is growing interest in AF screening; however, the most suitable population and device for AF detection remain to be explored. Therefore, Dr Emma Sandgren (Karolinksa Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden) and her team wanted to evaluate in the CONSIDERING-AF trial (NCT05838781), whether it is beneficial to perform an AF screening in the elderly (≥65 years) [2]. All inhabitants in the region of Halland (Sweden) in this age group but without diagnosed AF were included in this randomised, controlled, non-blinded trial and divided in 4 parallel arms. The researchers compared AF screening (14 days of continuous ECG patch) versus standard-of-care (n=740 per arm) in both the general population and patients with risk factors (according to a risk-prediction model (RPM). Primary outcome was defined as the incident AF in the different groups [1].
The RPM cohort was older and had more risk factors compared with the general cohort. The participation rate was remarkably high in the study: 44% in the group without risk factors and 41% in the high-risk group. The primary outcome, defined as the incident AF recorded after 6 months, was significantly different between groups: 3.8% of patients in the high-risk intervention group compared with 0.7% in the general control group had incident AF (P< 0.001). As Dr Sandgren pointed out, the results of the per-protocol analysis showed that the risk model was successful in identifying participants at risk.
Prof. Jeff Healey (Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada), the discussant of the trial, emphasised that there is a lot of interest in screening for AF to prevent stroke amongst other things, but the effect will be small. “So, it becomes really important to drill down into the highest risk populations, in both risk of having the condition atrial fibrillation but also the risk of having the complications like stroke”, he commented. Indeed, in CONSIDERING-AF incidence of AF in the high-risk screening group was more than 3 times greater than in the general screening group.
In summary, CONSIDERING-AF showed that the combination of the risk-prediction model and long-term ECG recording was superior to the standard of care in identifying de novo AF.
- Etminani F, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e080639.
- Sandgren E, et al. DeteCtiON and Stroke PreventIon by MoDEl ScRreenING for Atrial Fibrillation. Late-breaking science 3, EHRA 2025, 30 March –01 April, Vienna, Austria.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Educational e-mail before AF conversion treatment ups anti-coagulation adherence Next Article
SafeHeart predicts arrhythmias and clinical deterioration »
« Educational e-mail before AF conversion treatment ups anti-coagulation adherence Next Article
SafeHeart predicts arrhythmias and clinical deterioration »
Table of Contents: EHRA 2025
Featured articles
Symptomatic embolisms after AF ablation: new insights on outcomes and predictors
Marked clinical benefit by MPP compared with BVP
Diagnostics, Monitoring, and Prevention
Myocardial fibrosis triples arrhythmia risk in NICM patients
SafeHeart predicts arrhythmias and clinical deterioration
Atrial fibrillation screening: beneficial in high-risk patients
Educational e-mail before AF conversion treatment ups anti-coagulation adherence
AF and dementia: largest Mediterranean cohort reveals age-dependent association
Atrial Fibrillation
PFA non-inferior to CBA in symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Paroxysmal AF ablation: dual energy catheter demonstrates benefit at 12 months
Ablation for paroxysmal AF: endpoint of non-inferiority of vHPSD to cryoballoon not met
Symptomatic embolisms after AF ablation: new insights on outcomes and predictors
Ventricular Arrhythmias
S-ICD: an alternative for sudden cardiac death prevention in Brugada syndrome
PFA shows potential in safety and efficacy of catheter ablations for ventricular arrhythmias
Electrical storm patients at increased risk of VT recurrence after catheter success
Treatment of VT: iATP shows promising results in the fast ventricular tachycardia zone
Devices & Resynchronisation Therapy
Marked clinical benefit by MPP compared with BVP
Landmark Chinese trial reveals that LBBP slashes hospitalisation
Need for post-TAVI pacemaker implantation linked to poorer outcomes
Anticoagulation & Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Apixaban vs aspirin: more bleedings overall but fewer at critical sites
SWISS-APERO demonstrates comparable safety, potential efficacy edge for Amulet
Related Articles
September 8, 2020
Factor V Leiden mutation linked to atrial fibrillation
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com