https://doi.org/10.55788/4ec3f24d
“Most patients with a myocardial infarction (MI) are lipid-lowering therapy-naïve at admission,” said Prof. Ray Kausik (Imperial College London, UK) [1]. “Furthermore, only 1 in 4 post-MI patients reaches their LDL-cholesterol goals on monotherapy within 3 months of their event.” Prof. Kausik argued that the use of combination therapy could increase the rate of patients achieving LDL-cholesterol goals. “The ideal scenario is to reach the lipid goals quickly and durably since this is associated with the best cardiovascular outcomes.” Prof. Kausik further explained that the current lipid-lowering therapy guidelines use a step-wise approach, starting with monotherapy and only adding an extra therapy if the goal is not achieved after 4–6 months.
Prof. Kausik and colleagues aimed to improve this process by developing a decision support system based on estimated cardiovascular risks and potential benefits of lipid-lowering therapies. Participants with ACS from Spain, Italy, and the UK (n=1,139) were randomised 1:1 to usual care or the decision support system. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients receiving combination therapy, intensification of monotherapy, or escalated combination therapy within 16 weeks of their ACS.
At 16 weeks, 54.7% of the participants in the experimental arm and 48.7% of those in the control arm had achieved their LDL-cholesterol goals, which was a numerical but non-significant difference (adjusted RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.93–1.41). Notably, the early use of combination therapies was high in the usual care arm, higher than reported in historical data, as mentioned by Prof. Kausik.
“Although the results were not significant, favourable trends were observed for the decision support system,” concluded Prof. Kausik. “This matter requires further investigation, including the possibility of implementing the decision support system in other settings.”
“A large proportion of participants in the control arm was already on therapies with considerable LDL-lowering potential,” commented Prof. Tracy Wang (PCORI, Washington DC, USA). “The question is whether routine practice has already changed or whether we are looking at a Hawthorne effect.”
- Kausik R, et al. Imperial: Optimisation of lipid lowering therapies using a decision support system in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ZODIAC): a randomised trial. LBS.06, AHA Scientific Sessions 2024, 16–18 November, Chicago, USA.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« KRAKEN: Encouraging phase 2 results of Lp(a)-lowering muvalaplin Next Article
ENBALV: Edoxaban or warfarin as anticoagulant after bioprosthetic valve replacement? »
« KRAKEN: Encouraging phase 2 results of Lp(a)-lowering muvalaplin Next Article
ENBALV: Edoxaban or warfarin as anticoagulant after bioprosthetic valve replacement? »
Table of Contents: AHA 2024
Featured articles
Ablation for Arrhythmias
PROMPT-AF: Novel ablation strategy improves outcomes for persistent AF
ARREST-AF: The true impact of risk factor management on AF recurrence after ablation
VANISH2: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation in prior myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachycardia?
OPTION: LAAC over OAC after ablation in patients with AF and increased stroke risk
Head-to-head: Cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation in persistent AF
Novel Treatment Options in Heart Failure
Will myeloperoxidase inhibition benefit patients with heart failure?
Is intranasal bumetanide a viable diuretic option in congestive HF?
REALIZE-K: MRA treatment optimisation in HFrEF plus hyperkalaemia
SUMMIT: Tirzepatide reduces cardiovascular events in HFpEF plus obesity
CAD, PAD, and Valvular Heart Disease
CLEAR Outcomes: Bempedoic acid reduces MACE and MALE in patients with PAD
GLORIOUS: Restrictive versus liberal oxygenation during CPB-assisted surgery
GLORIOUS: GLP-1 agonist did not meet primary endpoint in CABG
CLEAR SYNERGY: Can routine spironolactone improve post-MI outcomes?
ENBALV: Edoxaban or warfarin as anticoagulant after bioprosthetic valve replacement?
Prospects in Prevention
ZODIAC: Can we improve lipid-lowering strategies in ACS?
KRAKEN: Encouraging phase 2 results of Lp(a)-lowering muvalaplin
Reconditioned pacemakers may save lives in low/middle-income countries
Novel small-interfering RNA effectively reduced Lp(a) in phase 2
Impactful Hypertension Strategies
Comparing dual antihypertensive combination therapies in a South Asian population
BPROAD: Intensive or standard BP treatment strategy in type 2 diabetes?
Innovative Studies in Heart Disease
Promising results for CRISPR-based therapy in ATTR-CM
NUDGE-FLU: Effect of science-informed letters on influenza vaccination rates
Related Articles
February 3, 2025
Promising results for CRISPR-based therapy in ATTR-CM
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
