https://doi.org/10.55788/32a53a8f
The CRRF-PeAF trial compared cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation in a large cohort of patients with persistent AF. The 500 participants were randomised 1:1 to cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency ablation. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias at 1 year of follow-up. Dr Kengo Kusano (National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan) presented the results [1].
No difference was seen in the primary endpoint between the 2 arms (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.69–1.43; Plogrank=0.96). This finding was consistent across subgroups. “We did, however, see a significant reduction in left atrial volume index in the radiofrequency group as compared with the cryoballoon group at 1-year post-ablation, suggesting that the 2 ablation techniques have a different impact on reverse remodelling,” added Dr Kusano (see Figure). “A possible explanation for the different impact of radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation is the fact that cryoballoon ablation is associated with wider, more continuous lesions than radiofrequency ablation, which may result in more injury to the myocardium, leading to a less pronounced atrial remodelling.”
Figure: Left atrial volume index at baseline and 1-year post ablation [1]

“Cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation yielded similar arrhythmia outcomes in patients with persistent AF,” concluded Dr Kusano. “Although we know that cryoballoon ablation has a shorter procedure time than radiofrequency ablation, the latter was associated with inducing more profound structural changes to the left atrium.”
- Kusano K, et al. Cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (CRRF-PEAF): a prospective, multicenter, randomised, non-inferiority clinical trial. LBS.07, AHA Scientific Sessions 2024, 16–18 November, Chicago, USA.
Copyright ©2025 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Will myeloperoxidase inhibition benefit patients with heart failure? Next Article
OPTION: LAAC over OAC after ablation in patients with AF and increased stroke risk »
« Will myeloperoxidase inhibition benefit patients with heart failure? Next Article
OPTION: LAAC over OAC after ablation in patients with AF and increased stroke risk »
Table of Contents: AHA 2024
Featured articles
Ablation for Arrhythmias
PROMPT-AF: Novel ablation strategy improves outcomes for persistent AF
ARREST-AF: The true impact of risk factor management on AF recurrence after ablation
VANISH2: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation in prior myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachycardia?
OPTION: LAAC over OAC after ablation in patients with AF and increased stroke risk
Head-to-head: Cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation in persistent AF
Novel Treatment Options in Heart Failure
Will myeloperoxidase inhibition benefit patients with heart failure?
Is intranasal bumetanide a viable diuretic option in congestive HF?
REALIZE-K: MRA treatment optimisation in HFrEF plus hyperkalaemia
SUMMIT: Tirzepatide reduces cardiovascular events in HFpEF plus obesity
CAD, PAD, and Valvular Heart Disease
CLEAR Outcomes: Bempedoic acid reduces MACE and MALE in patients with PAD
GLORIOUS: Restrictive versus liberal oxygenation during CPB-assisted surgery
GLORIOUS: GLP-1 agonist did not meet primary endpoint in CABG
CLEAR SYNERGY: Can routine spironolactone improve post-MI outcomes?
ENBALV: Edoxaban or warfarin as anticoagulant after bioprosthetic valve replacement?
Prospects in Prevention
ZODIAC: Can we improve lipid-lowering strategies in ACS?
KRAKEN: Encouraging phase 2 results of Lp(a)-lowering muvalaplin
Reconditioned pacemakers may save lives in low/middle-income countries
Novel small-interfering RNA effectively reduced Lp(a) in phase 2
Impactful Hypertension Strategies
Comparing dual antihypertensive combination therapies in a South Asian population
BPROAD: Intensive or standard BP treatment strategy in type 2 diabetes?
Innovative Studies in Heart Disease
Promising results for CRISPR-based therapy in ATTR-CM
NUDGE-FLU: Effect of science-informed letters on influenza vaccination rates
Related Articles

February 3, 2025
Promising results for CRISPR-based therapy in ATTR-CM
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com