She explained the problem: adalimumab therapy is hampered by primary and secondary non-response. The lack of response is because in many patients only low serum drug levels can be detected, which is directly attributable to the formation of antidrug antibodies. The researchers sought to optimise adalimumab efficacy by applying a trick learned from rheumatoid arthritis, namely that the addition of methotrexate can alleviate this problem. The investigators performed a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in psoriasis patients, which was assessor-blinded in 5 hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium. They compared adalimumab (n=30) vs adalimumab with methotrexate (10 mg/week supplemented with folic acid; n=31). All patients were eligible for adalimumab therapy according to the guidelines (PASI >8) and were adalimumab naïve. There will be follow-up every 12 weeks for 3 years, but because the trial is still ongoing, this presentation presented the key results for the first year.
Looking at the efficacy, significantly more patients in the combination arm reach PASI-75 at week 49 on adalimumab + methotrexate (58%) vs 31% in the monotherapy group (P=0.04). With regard to drug survival, patients on the combination arm have a slightly better drug survival at week 49, with 59% adalimumab vs 74% adalimumab + methotrexate; although these data are not statistically significant at this time point (P=0.26). Thirdly, the serum trough levels were significantly higher in the combination arm at about 6 mg/L (vs about 3.5 mg/L in patients treated with adalimumab alone). Lastly, antidrug antibody formation after a year was 47% in the adalimumab group vs 16% in the adalimumab + methotrexate (P=0.01).
- Van der Kraaij G. P018, SPIN 2019, 25-27 April, Paris, France.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Understanding genetics to unravel psoriasis and atopic dermatitis pathogenesis Next Article
Brodalumab onset of action is significantly faster than ustekinumab: Results from the phase 3 AMAGINE-2 and -3 studies »
« Understanding genetics to unravel psoriasis and atopic dermatitis pathogenesis Next Article
Brodalumab onset of action is significantly faster than ustekinumab: Results from the phase 3 AMAGINE-2 and -3 studies »
Table of Contents: SPIN 2019
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
Aetiology: Triggers and Risk Factors
Understanding genetics to unravel psoriasis and atopic dermatitis pathogenesis
Atopic dermatitis and psoriasis: on a spectrum?
Advances in Therapy
Advances in target-oriented therapy: psoriatic arthritis
Favourable safety profile of long-term use of ixekizumab
Brodalumab onset of action is significantly faster than ustekinumab: Results from the phase 3 AMAGINE-2 and -3 studies
Adalimumab vs adalimumab + methotrexate in psoriasis: First-year results on effectiveness, drug survival, safety, and immunogenicity
Ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in paediatric patients
Fumarates and vitamin A derivatives advance and latest insights in non-biologic systemic therapeutic agents in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis
Certolizumab: Long-term safety and efficacy results for psoriasis-related nail disease
Novel Considerations
Granulomatous rosacea: exploratory histological markers
Live imaging of cutaneous immune responses
Results from the ECLIPSE trial: does blocking IL-23 have better long-term outcomes in psoriasis?
ABP501 biosimilar for adalimumab: What you need to know
Sustained and complete responses from the phase 3 AMAGINE-2 and -3 studies
Reduction in coronary artery disease in psoriasis patients treated with biologic therapies, possible implications for atopic dermatitis
Small molecules, apremilast, and TYK2
Related Articles
September 17, 2021
Rapid pustule and skin clearance with IL-36 receptor inhibitor spesolimab
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com