In the phase 3 AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3 trials, Lebwohl et al. set out to describe and compare the onset of action, measured as the improvements in efficacy and quality of life, of brodalumab and ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis [2]. This pooled analysis included data from patients who were randomised to constant ustekinumab (n=590) or brodalumab (n=339) 210 mg every 2 weeks. Efficacy was measured at number of patients with 75% or 100% improvement in the psoriasis area severity index (PASI) score, the attainments of an absolute PASI score of 2 or less, and achievement of a Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1.
Patients treated with brodalumab had a far more rapid response and a significantly higher proportion achieved PASI-75 already at week 2 compared with ustekinumab (OR 8.5, P<0.001). Even more impressive was that patients treated with brodalumab had a >15 higher chance of achieving complete skin clearance (PASI-100) already after 4 weeks of treatment compared with ustekinumab (OR 15.6, P<0.001). This trend still holds true at week 12, at which point twice as many patients have achieved PASI-100. The take-home message was that both drugs may be clinically effective, but the greatest difference between the treatments is at the earlier timepoints; particularly for complete clearance at week 4. These results confirm the significantly faster onset of action with brodalumab compared with ustekinumab in both clinical efficacy as well as patient-reported outcome measures.
- Philipp S, et al. P006, SPIN 2019, 25-27 April, Paris, France.
- Lebwohl MG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1318-28.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Adalimumab vs adalimumab + methotrexate in psoriasis: First-year results on effectiveness, drug survival, safety, and immunogenicity Next Article
Favourable safety profile of long-term use of ixekizumab »
« Adalimumab vs adalimumab + methotrexate in psoriasis: First-year results on effectiveness, drug survival, safety, and immunogenicity Next Article
Favourable safety profile of long-term use of ixekizumab »
Table of Contents: SPIN 2019
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
Aetiology: Triggers and Risk Factors
Understanding genetics to unravel psoriasis and atopic dermatitis pathogenesis
Atopic dermatitis and psoriasis: on a spectrum?
Advances in Therapy
Advances in target-oriented therapy: psoriatic arthritis
Favourable safety profile of long-term use of ixekizumab
Brodalumab onset of action is significantly faster than ustekinumab: Results from the phase 3 AMAGINE-2 and -3 studies
Adalimumab vs adalimumab + methotrexate in psoriasis: First-year results on effectiveness, drug survival, safety, and immunogenicity
Ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in paediatric patients
Fumarates and vitamin A derivatives advance and latest insights in non-biologic systemic therapeutic agents in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis
Certolizumab: Long-term safety and efficacy results for psoriasis-related nail disease
Novel Considerations
Granulomatous rosacea: exploratory histological markers
Live imaging of cutaneous immune responses
Results from the ECLIPSE trial: does blocking IL-23 have better long-term outcomes in psoriasis?
ABP501 biosimilar for adalimumab: What you need to know
Sustained and complete responses from the phase 3 AMAGINE-2 and -3 studies
Reduction in coronary artery disease in psoriasis patients treated with biologic therapies, possible implications for atopic dermatitis
Small molecules, apremilast, and TYK2
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com