She recommended that the primary endpoint in controlled trials investigating preventive treatment in chronic migraine should either be defined as one or a combination of the following: change in migraine days, change in moderate-to-severe headache days, or responder rate. Dr Pozo-Rosich suggested that these three potential endpoints, if not selected as primary endpoints, should be considered as secondary endpoints. She said that efficacy can be assessed as improvements in headache frequency and intensity, in acute medication intake reduction, in better response to analgesics, in disability rates, and infrequency of associated symptoms/comorbidities such as depression. Pre-treatment evaluation, early response after 3 to 6 months, and long-term response after one year all have relevance as potential time points for assessing response to migraine prevention treatment. In addition, tolerability and adverse events should be evaluated and the non-responder rate determined.
What does a patient need?
Dr Pozo-Rosich continued that patients desperately want to stop the migraine cycle. They want to plan and programme their lives, be able to pack their luggage with more clothes than pills and tolerate noises and lights. Other study participants mentioned that they wish to forget the anxiety they feel of not knowing when the next migraine will hit.
Thus, an efficient preventive measure for migraine first of all needs to be effective and tolerable, facilitate adherence, be persistence in effect, and should be designed for migraine, she said. Onabotulinum toxin A is a treatment specifically approved for the prophylaxis of chronic migraine in adults. When it comes to dosing, it became apparent over the years that 195 units are better than 155 units (no increase in secondary effects, improvement in disability).
1. Pozo-Rosich P, et al. Poster 216, TOXINS 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark, 16-19 January, 2019.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Pain subsides before effect on muscles become apparent Next Article
ASPIRE: High patient and clinician satisfaction »
« Pain subsides before effect on muscles become apparent Next Article
ASPIRE: High patient and clinician satisfaction »
Table of Contents: TOXINS 2019
Featured articles
Pain
Pain subsides before effect on muscles become apparent
Migraine
Central and peripheral mechanisms in migraine
Predictors of response
Spasticity
Why treat spasticity?
ASPIRE: High patient and clinician satisfaction
Cervical Dystonia
Anterocollis posture and deep cervical muscle injections
Daxibotulinum toxin in isolated cervical dystonia
Parkinson
Utility of botulinum toxin in Parkinson’s disease beyond sialorrhea
New Versions of Botulinum Toxins
New Versions of Botulinum Toxins
Related Articles
March 4, 2019
Letter from the Editor
March 15, 2019
Central and peripheral mechanisms in migraine
March 4, 2019
Interview with Prof. Wolfgang Jost
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com
