https://doi.org/10.55788/6719a70a
There are 4 FDA-approved treatments for aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-positive NMOSD: satralizumab, eculizumab, ravulizumab, and inebilizumab. Traditionally, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and especially rituximab have been used as first-line immunosuppressive treatments for NMOSD; these are still commonly prescribed. On rituximab, relapse failure rates for patients with NMOSD of up to 35% have been reported [1]. Dr Philippe-Antoine Bilodeau (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, MA, USA) and colleagues aimed to establish the comparative effectiveness and safety of NMOSD therapies in a cohort of their own patients [2].
The researchers set up a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in 178 patients, who had a mean age at diagnosis of 45.3 years, were mostly AQP4-positive (86.5%), women (83.7%), and White (62.9%); 128 patients received rituximab, 40 received mycophenolate mofetil, 14 azathioprine, 12 satralizumab, 12 eculizumab, and 9 inebilizumab. The median follow-up was 9.8 years.
Despite suppressed B cells, rituximab had a failure rate (≥1 relapse while on therapy) of 30%, while the new FDA-approved therapies had no failures. Higher doses of rituximab were not more protective. There was a high burden of non-relapse hospitalisations, primarily due to infection. Of patients on rituximab, 28.7% had an infection-related hospitalisation. There was a signal towards lower rates of infection-related hospitalisations on eculizumab versus rituximab. The researchers added that conducting a multicentre analysis would help to further validate these results, especially the outcomes on rituximab.
- Barreras P, et al. Neurology. 2022;99(22):e2504-16.
- Bilodeau P-A, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in a real-world neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder cohort (NMOSD). P022, ECTRIMS 2024, 18–20 September, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Age, time, and treatment determine relapse risk in MOGAD Next Article
Ineffective response to EBV in MS not seen in similar diseases »
« Age, time, and treatment determine relapse risk in MOGAD Next Article
Ineffective response to EBV in MS not seen in similar diseases »
Table of Contents: ECTRIMS 2024
Featured articles
Revised McDonald criteria allow earlier and more precise MS diagnosis
Approaches to RIS and MS converge
Diagnosis, Biomarkers, and Phenotypes
Revised McDonald criteria allow earlier and more precise MS diagnosis
Approaches to RIS and MS converge
AI versus clinicians: who diagnoses MS faster and better?
Blood markers predict MS progression
Gut microbiota modulate inflammation and cortical damage
Risk factors and importance of persistent PIRA
Vitamin D supplementation in progressive MS should be medically supervised
Treatment: Strategies
Encouraging real-world results of AHSCT to treat aggressive MS
CAR T-cell therapy in MS: in its infancy but highly anticipated
B cell-tailored dosing of ocrelizumab shows good results
First-line moderate-efficacy DMTs show similar efficacy
Treatment: Trials
Tolebrutinib slows disability worsening in relapsing MS
Frexalimab shows favourable safety and efficacy in OLE
Good safety of ozanimod over up to 8 years of treatment
Tolebrutinib slows disability in non-relapsing SPMS
High-dose simvastatin does not slow disability progression in SPMS
Pregnancy and Comorbidity Risks
Transfer of ocrelizumab into breastmilk is negligible
High genetic burden for depression associated with MS disease activity
More comorbidity is associated with worse clinical outcomes in MS
NMOSD/MOGAD
Ineffective response to EBV in MS not seen in similar diseases
Comparative effectiveness and safety of DMTs in NMOSD
Age, time, and treatment determine relapse risk in MOGAD
Related Articles
October 5, 2021
Study confirms link between dementia risk and eye disorders
December 9, 2021
The role of astrocyte phenotypes in acute MS lesions
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com